Swords in the Moon [Concluded]

[Beskar]

Ok, I will say it.

Unvote: Abstain; Vote: Stephen Asen


Reasons?:

In the first killing, it was noticeable that some one didn't do a kill.

In the night-phase, Olavi posted:

I say it here too. This samurai will be absent for two days and then I'll have time to play.

Olavi got killed, some one must have thought him being absence from the game would be a thing, and didn't feel guilty killing him off as he won't be here, compared to some one who is playing.

Andres later says:

Orders I must get
from lazy slackers with roles
patience is virtue

Some one obviously not posted their kill in for their role. Who can it be?

I read further on, to see who posted for any clues.

Don't worry, my friend. Death is not the end, it is just another beginning.

~:Puts the pen aside listens to the grim news that has happened in his absence :~

He posted about Death (possibly that of his victim)
He hasn't been playing hence his absence, hence why he missed posting in his kill and possibly did not kill in the first night phase as well and just coming into the game on the last page and seeing Olavi's post and decided he would do for a victim as he will stop playing: "I know, I will target him, he is leaving anyway so won't be here".

I would not recommend killing all the experienced people since it won't solve the problem (not all of the assassins are experienced).

Why he might target lurkers/absent peoples opposed to those who are posting.

ALSO: Andres posted the end of turn, after his post, when it was due to finish at 30 minutes past, which must mean all the roles were accounted for.