Results 1 to 30 of 43

Thread: Review of Empire for those who like historical correctness

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member Didz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Bedfordshire UK
    Posts
    2,368

    Default Re: Review of Empire for those who like historical correctness

    Quote Originally Posted by AussieGiant View Post
    That's a little contradictory.

    You agree that historian's will swear that anything’s true. And therefore they will think they are correct.

    Yet when it comes to uniforms and weapons it's all black and white and would have taken 10 minutes.
    No its not...but like I said. I am dissppointed that CA didn't put in effort where it was needed. But thats my opinion. End of.
    Didz
    Fortis balore et armis

  2. #2
    Member Member TB666's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Malmö, Sweden
    Posts
    1,519

    Default Sv: Re: Review of Empire for those who like historical correctness

    Quote Originally Posted by Didz View Post
    No its not...but like I said. I am dissppointed that CA didn't put in effort where it was needed. But thats my opinion. End of.
    Well it was not in uniforms where the effort was needed.
    I rather have them spend 6 months getting sea battles to work(which is does thankfully) or even spend a year getting land battles to work perfectly then spend wasting 10 minutes making sure the soldiers shoelaces are tied in a historically correct way.

  3. #3
    Member Member Didz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Bedfordshire UK
    Posts
    2,368

    Default Re: Sv: Re: Review of Empire for those who like historical correctness

    Quote Originally Posted by TB666 View Post
    Well it was not in uniforms where the effort was needed.
    I rather have them spend 6 months getting sea battles to work(which is does thankfully) or even spend a year getting land battles to work perfectly then spend wasting 10 minutes making sure the soldiers shoelaces are tied in a historically correct way.
    True, but the blog I watched was not about either getting the naval battles to work, or getting the land battles to work. It was about getting the sea to work, or at least look pretty. And I have to say they did an amazing job, the sea looks wonderful, its probably the most accurate part of the game. Really looking forward to fighting a naval battle in a storm.

    Getting back on topic for second...I think the thing to remember is that Colonel Bill is a wargamer writing a review for fellow wargamers on a wargaming site. Therefore, he is providing people who care about the history with an insight into whether ETW is the game that the millions of wargamers out there have been waiting for, and basically, he saying 'forget it'.

    That doesn't stop ETW being an enjoyable game to play, it just means its not going to be adopted as the standard wargame platform for online wargaming groups. No doubt they will continue to struggle with modified versions of John Tiller's rubbish. Not sure how many copies of Battleground games get sold annually but it seems to keep him in doughnuts anyway.
    Last edited by Didz; 04-24-2009 at 12:04.
    Didz
    Fortis balore et armis

  4. #4
    Loitering Senior Member AussieGiant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Zurich
    Posts
    4,162

    Default Re: Review of Empire for those who like historical correctness

    And we continue...

    I think everyone has a point.

    And as long as no one say's they are "right" and others are "wrong" then there is something for everyone to take on board as part of understanding another perons point of view.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO