I am sorry but this goes slightly to the other extreme. I will have to say few words.
Well, I think the closest case is Macedonia/Bulgaria and Cyprus/Greece and Turkey. I think there are many historical reasons to call the people of Moldavia people with "Romanian" origin. What is Romania: an union between Wallachia and Moldavia. Yet, this does not mean Romania shall annex Moldavia. In the same way as Cyprus was not annexed by Greece or Macedonia by Bulgaria. It's not how the modern policy shall work!
You are right Romania and Bulgaria (I am Bulgarian btw) failed in many things. Yet, this does not mean they are lost causes. In the same way as Greece was not a lost cause after the WW2. We leave in one peninsula. Of course, the Romanian and Bulgarian people and politicians shall not sit idle but be as active as possible to develop their countries. For you are right, we can not rely on foreign money.
About paying money. If certain conditions are met, I see nothing bad in the near future Bulgaria to pay money for the integration say of Macedonia or Moldavia. But of course, EU is not charity.
And please, I am fed up with the image of the Bulgarians and Romanians as illegal workers or second-hand people. This is only one part of the picture. I know quite a good number people who earn their money (both in Bulgaria and abroad) honestly.
Diplomacy is the key. Here I agree 100 per cent. Otherwise, I agree Cronos Impera was quite extreme in certain thoughts.![]()
Bookmarks