Well I guess we will just have to disagree then. An asteroid will be coming for us someday and one will cause massive damage and I don't want to be in the situation where we need to scramble for solutions because we assume that with a such a small probability it will never happen. Deadly impacts are not uncommon for the Earth, everyone might know about the one that killed the dinosaurs but for some reason people don't recall the Tunguska Event.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunguska_event
Section from wiki.
"Although the Tunguska event is believed to be the largest impact event on land in Earth's recent history,[8] impacts of similar size in remote ocean areas would have gone unnoticed before the advent of global satellite monitoring in the 1960s and 1970s."
Yes, we will certainly need to do something sometime. But I don't believe it's necessary to do it now. Seems like protecting the earths environment and people would be a higher priority, given the low chance of asteroid strike in the near future.
Technically we don't know what the probably is because we have not spotted every possible object there is. For all we know there is one with a 100% chance of hitting us in the next year and we have not spotted it. Asteroids are a hidden danger that literally can spring up as a major threat at any moment, so why put off solutions toward it?
And its not like we have to dwell on one problem at a time.
So more telescopes it is then, and some reworked ICBMs to nudge them out of the way (fingers crossed) if found. Again, no need to stick some prefabs on Mars.
![]()
An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
"If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill
An ICBM does not have the capacity to send anything big in low Earth orbit so far away missions are not an option. But we have rockets like Delta, Ariane or Proton that are used for interplanetary missions and that should be enough. Maybe payloads will have to be bigger, as I don't know how big an ion engine or mirror is needed, but bigger rockets are being developed anyway.
CBR
Bookmarks