Quote Originally Posted by Brenus View Post
"In essence the point is wether you can censor someone because other people are or might be offended. This is entirely the point of blasphemy laws in western countries and a large part of holocaust laws as well." Er, I disagee on this. Holocaust deniers are somehow saying that a crime didn't exist. They in fact are saying that all documents proving it are forgery and that Nuremberg Trial was a farce. They just deny the fact that survivors are survivors. It is not about feelings. It is about facts.
So, each time one of the deniers talk, he/she is able to prove his/her point in front of a Court of Justice. They, of course, failled each time.

Blasphemy can offend religious people. And the definition of it is given by the Offended Ones. So of course, they tailor a nice definition of it.
In their view a woman in mini shirt offends them so she should be ban to wear it because women should be attractive or should be modest, in their terms and conditions... It is where they win.
The idea is that it isn't against the law to hold an incorrect idea or belief. Should it be against the law to deny other facts besides the Holocaust?