Di Immortales! We've been transported back in time ten years!
Edit: (OOC: I study Roman history. The year we are in is 49BC. Bibulus was consul in 59BC. As I stated above the two consuls of the year are C. Claudius Marcellus and P. Cornelius Lentulus Crus. I'm fairly sure a quick check of wiki will confirm this.)
Last edited by Gaius Scribonius Curio; 05-26-2009 at 01:21.
Nihil nobis metuendum est, praeter metum ipsum. - Caesar
We have not to fear anything, except fear itself.
Ibant obscuri sola sub nocte per umbram
perque domos Ditis vacuas et inania regna:
quale per incertam lunam sub luce maligna
est iter in silvis, ubi caelum condidit umbra
Iuppiter, et rebus nox abstulit atra colorem. - Vergil
In addition to the historical inaccuracies, YLC has also overlooked the fact that Tincow gave us a template for the Consul PM, which does not resemble this at all.Originally Posted by YLC
Notice how at the very top underneath the name it says 'Consul' rather than 'Senator'. Furthermore I would draw your attention to the fact that the Consuls ability is already outlined... in detail. I would suggest Senators that at the very least Marcus Calpurnius has been trapped in a lie before the Senate in session. This would make him guilty of perjury, even were we not in the midst of a crisis. As it is sadly I must claim that his motives were treasonous, and thereby advocate his proscription. I urge all Senators to vote with me on this issue. LG can be targetted tomorrow, and in any case has had no chance to speak in his defence. Marcus Calpurnius (YLC) has made a total mess of his own defence and is more likely to be Pompeian than anything else.Originally Posted by Tincow
Last edited by Gaius Scribonius Curio; 05-26-2009 at 01:43.
Nihil nobis metuendum est, praeter metum ipsum. - Caesar
We have not to fear anything, except fear itself.
Ibant obscuri sola sub nocte per umbram
perque domos Ditis vacuas et inania regna:
quale per incertam lunam sub luce maligna
est iter in silvis, ubi caelum condidit umbra
Iuppiter, et rebus nox abstulit atra colorem. - Vergil
But someone who is caught in a lie is a better proscription than someone whose falsity is conjectured, and has had no oppurtunity to speak in their defence.
(OOC: I'd prefer to see YLC lynched than LG, at least if there are a few more votes on him it gives those who haven't voted another viable choice.)
Nihil nobis metuendum est, praeter metum ipsum. - Caesar
We have not to fear anything, except fear itself.
Ibant obscuri sola sub nocte per umbram
perque domos Ditis vacuas et inania regna:
quale per incertam lunam sub luce maligna
est iter in silvis, ubi caelum condidit umbra
Iuppiter, et rebus nox abstulit atra colorem. - Vergil
What is the case against LG?
Names, secret names
But never in my favour
But when all is said and done
It's you I love
This is very, very odd. I've observed YLC to have guards on multiple occasions, so I assumed he must have been a Consul or Praetor. Later he confirmed it to me, and we saw it as well in the write-ups... if YLC is not a Consul, he is not a Praetor, either- GH was one and I know the other. That means he must be a different role entirely. Whether or not he is mafia...
Unvote: LG
I'm not going to vote for him yet, because I'm unsure of what's going on. But I may change my mind.
Vote: Abstain
Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer: The Gameroom
dude you basically signed your own death warrant.....
Micheal D'Anjou
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
YLC's claim seems to have been made out of boredom more than having a specific motive behind it.
LG, however was lying for more sinister reasons. And is avoiding responding here.
The only who perceive a benefit from this useless discussion is the ones who are murdering every night our fellow senators. I'd like to hear more about LG. There is not a lot of info, but Sasaki is respalded by Pompey. Pompey said that Ichigo was right, that he was crazy and Sasaki had evidence. Yet this says nothing.
Names, secret names
But never in my favour
But when all is said and done
It's you I love
LG also hasn't posted in Fillet Royale, which makes me think he's busy in RL. I'd rather hear from him before lynching him based on your suspicions. Even if YLC is telling the truth, he lied about being a power role for no real reason and has threatened that we will regret it if we try to lynch him. We don't need him around.
I'm still finding it funny that people think I am an idiot, must run in mafia games where the mafia are all completely lost on trying to remain undercover - seriously, if the Consul pm is open to the public, why would I not use that from my previous PM and forge it if I was mafia? Makes infinitely more sense.
Seriously, give me a slice of intelligence, credit it me with some neural activity.
You can vig YLC if you want to. "we don't need him around" isn't a reason for lynch.
Whatever, I'm done discussing this. My vote stays where it is, everyone else can do what they think is best.
Maybe we should just leave the mafia to kill off YLC themselves, instead of doing their dirty work for them. That is what he wants, if I recall correctly.
Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer: The Gameroom
Does anyone have an updated tally?
Ekklesia Mafia: - An exciting new mafia game set in ancient Athens - Sign up NOW!
***
"Oh, how I wish we could have just one Diet session where the Austrians didn't spend the entire time complaining about something." Fredericus von Hamburg
Bookmarks