What you mean like the British did at Colluden?
Pretty unsporting but if the AI has turned up without any decent artillery like the Scots, what do you expect.
Thats why the batteries carried heavy case.
Well unfortunately, Captain Mercer as well as a number of other writers from the period beg to differ. The point is that any round which was not a solid ball becomes compressed as it travels up the barrel and effectively the only thing that prevents it spreading laterally to diserpate the energy behind it is the wall of the barrel, hence you get more barrel wear. Attempts were made to reduce this problem by placing a sabot behind the missile package which would act a bit like a plunger and push the missiles up the barrel but gunners of the time still noted that guns employed heavily in the firing of case shot wore out faster than guns that were employed soley for bombardment.
Well again I'm quoting from official documents from the early 19th century quoting the instructions to gunnery officers on the correct employment of case/cannister and they state 350 yards (British) 600 yards (French). Having said that we know that Mercer was actually using heavy case over round shot at virtually pointblank range against cavalry at Waterloo. He was also very concerned that one of his most worn guns might burst under the strain.
Bookmarks