Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 36

Thread: Cavalry charges

  1. #1
    Member Member Cyrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Milano ITA
    Posts
    353

    Default Cavalry charges

    Hello again everybody!
    After a long break from EB I've decided to come back, but first I have a question that has been on my mind for quite a while: how exactly would a stirrup-less rider cope with the impact?
    I've been riding horses for 5 years now and I can ride without'em, even gallop. But jumping and charging? it seems almost impossible unless one has his legs tied to the horse.
    I know of some gallic saddles made specifically for that reason wich had "lumps" (for lack of a better word) that would act as receivers of the impact (for lack of a better word) but those I think were pretty rare and expensive to make, am I right?
    Thx in advance


    Italians do it better! Chi dice donna dice guai. Abbi donna di te minore, se vuoi essere signore. Donne e buoi dei paesi tuoi. Fiume, grondaia e donna parlatora mandano l'uomo di casa fuora.
    And my personal favorite: "Non rimuovere il confine antico fissato dai tuoi padri". In english: "Do not remove the anchent border placed by your fathers". It looses something in the translation......

  2. #2

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    this is because, cavalry was not supposed to "crash" into the enemy but get close up to engage quickly then retreat maybe even dismount, it was just fast inf. plus if i owned that horse i know i wouldnt charge it into anything since it was worth very much, even if i somehow coerced it to charge into another object.
    Son of the Glorious Empire of Croatia
    traits: Distrusts Hairy Middle-Easteners, Reverant, Austere, True Roman.





  3. #3
    Member Member Cyrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Milano ITA
    Posts
    353

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    What i meant was that i imagine it would be nearly imossible to charge a horse without stirrups.
    Why the hell would I charge a horse agaist something\one?
    And then why is it mentioned time and time again in EB that horses would charge in the real sense of the word?
    PS what does fast inf mean?
    Last edited by Cyrus; 06-16-2009 at 20:30.


    Italians do it better! Chi dice donna dice guai. Abbi donna di te minore, se vuoi essere signore. Donne e buoi dei paesi tuoi. Fiume, grondaia e donna parlatora mandano l'uomo di casa fuora.
    And my personal favorite: "Non rimuovere il confine antico fissato dai tuoi padri". In english: "Do not remove the anchent border placed by your fathers". It looses something in the translation......

  4. #4
    Devout worshipper of Bilious Member miotas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,035

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    inf = infantry

    - Four Horsemen of the Presence

  5. #5
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    ...it can't have been *that* long since this was last discussed...

    Anyway, to nutshell it: you're trained in riding with stirrups. Back then, cavalrymen learned from ground up to do without in full combat. Easy as that, really; a lot of "impossible" acts are just a question of putting in enough training hours.

    As for the impact, eh. Just loosen your hold on the spear-shaft if it seems to become a problem, and let it "glide" until it's safe to grab it again and extract. This is really what the stirrup, the couching technique and eventually the full-plate lance-rest did, in fact; hike up the "absolute threshold" of impact the rider-horse team could deal with before having to "let loose" for safety reasons.
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  6. #6
    Member Member Cyrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Milano ITA
    Posts
    353

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    Quote Originally Posted by Watchman View Post
    Just loosen your hold on the spear-shaft if it seems to become a problem, and let it "glide" until it's safe to grab it again and extract. This is really what the stirrup, the couching technique and eventually the full-plate lance-rest did, in fact; hike up the "absolute threshold" of impact the rider-horse team could deal with before having to "let loose" for safety reasons.
    Sorry but could you explain that? i don't understand what you mean at all, eg how do i let a spear glide?


    Italians do it better! Chi dice donna dice guai. Abbi donna di te minore, se vuoi essere signore. Donne e buoi dei paesi tuoi. Fiume, grondaia e donna parlatora mandano l'uomo di casa fuora.
    And my personal favorite: "Non rimuovere il confine antico fissato dai tuoi padri". In english: "Do not remove the anchent border placed by your fathers". It looses something in the translation......

  7. #7
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    Loosen your grip on the damn thing so the problematic levels of impact force are no longer applied to the rider/mount team. Duh.
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  8. #8
    Member Member Cyrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Milano ITA
    Posts
    353

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    ok, what about the rest?


    Italians do it better! Chi dice donna dice guai. Abbi donna di te minore, se vuoi essere signore. Donne e buoi dei paesi tuoi. Fiume, grondaia e donna parlatora mandano l'uomo di casa fuora.
    And my personal favorite: "Non rimuovere il confine antico fissato dai tuoi padri". In english: "Do not remove the anchent border placed by your fathers". It looses something in the translation......

  9. #9
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    ...although, given the spear techniques used, just relaxing your arms in a controlled fashion and "rolling" the weapon out of the target would probably do the trick. Or in any case from what I've read this is how you extract the xyston when using the Mac one-handed lance technique, right off the charge.
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  10. #10
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyrus View Post
    ok, what about the rest?
    What rest ?
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  11. #11
    Member Member Cyrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Milano ITA
    Posts
    353

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    Quote Originally Posted by Watchman View Post
    This is really what the stirrup, the couching technique and eventually the full-plate lance-rest did, in fact; hike up the "absolute threshold" of impact the rider-horse team could deal with before having to "let loose" for safety reasons.
    this rest


    Italians do it better! Chi dice donna dice guai. Abbi donna di te minore, se vuoi essere signore. Donne e buoi dei paesi tuoi. Fiume, grondaia e donna parlatora mandano l'uomo di casa fuora.
    And my personal favorite: "Non rimuovere il confine antico fissato dai tuoi padri". In english: "Do not remove the anchent border placed by your fathers". It looses something in the translation......

  12. #12
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    You mean the lance-rest ?
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  13. #13
    Guest Aemilius Paulus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Russia/Europe in the summer, Florida rest of the time
    Posts
    3,473

    Thumbs up Re: Cavalry charges

    Forget not the saddles they used in the pre-stirrup era. Most of them had "horns" and various other features to hold the rider in place. Such as the back and the front of the saddle being very high to keep the horseman from falling with the shock of the charge. This and the techniques used for delivering the charge enabled cavalrymen to get by.

  14. #14
    Member Member Cyrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Milano ITA
    Posts
    353

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyrus View Post
    I know of some gallic saddles made specifically for that reason wich had "lumps" (for lack of a better word) that would act as receivers of the impact (for lack of a better word) but those I think were pretty rare and expensive to make, am I right?
    Thx in advance
    I already knew that as u can see AP.
    and watchman, what i don't understand is what is written in the quote box.


    Italians do it better! Chi dice donna dice guai. Abbi donna di te minore, se vuoi essere signore. Donne e buoi dei paesi tuoi. Fiume, grondaia e donna parlatora mandano l'uomo di casa fuora.
    And my personal favorite: "Non rimuovere il confine antico fissato dai tuoi padri". In english: "Do not remove the anchent border placed by your fathers". It looses something in the translation......

  15. #15
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    The saddle and stirrups keep the rider in the horse so he can absorb more impact. This allows for things like couching your lance and absorbing the impact instead of having to redirect the impact. Basically you can deliver much kinetic energy per run than you could with the uncouched techniques.

    Polish Winged Hussars even charged and broke through pikewalls.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  16. #16
    Guest Aemilius Paulus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Russia/Europe in the summer, Florida rest of the time
    Posts
    3,473

    Exclamation Re: Cavalry charges

    Quote Originally Posted by antisocialmunky View Post
    Polish Winged Hussars even charged and broke through pikewalls.
    Everyone had their brief and/or single moments of glory. The question is, how common was it for them to to such thing? Winged Hussars did not armour their horses, unlike their early contemporaries (gendarmes were eclipsing when winged hussars were just rising), the ultra-heavy French gendarmes. Now, by the Hussar's time (primarily 17th century), armour was becoming lighter and ever more sparse, so their unarmoured horses were the only norm, but still, I am wondering. Such as when that incident happened, when the hussars broke through pikes. And how the pikes were deployed. Too many variables here.

  17. #17
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    They managed to do it fairly often I believe. Certainly more than enough times to chalk it up to luck or coincidence. Again and again, they managed to literally just charge through enemy formations. Sometimes the Hussars managed to break the enemy with their initial charge and rout their opponents before.

    http://www.kismeta.com/diGrasse/HowHussarFought.htm

    This is a pretty in depth read on how winged Hussars managed to break pike and musket formations. I would take the calculations with a grain of salt but it does provide a good summary.

    Long story short, they used a combination of a very dense formation and extremely long lances to plow through a formation supplemented with excellent training and very high morale. The artistic depictions of winged hussars in a charge many times depict them in a running pike wall formation.

    What's probably less commented on is the role of artillery and missile fire to help disupt enemy formations so the Hussars could plow through them. Just like Napoleon's use of the column of attack, artillery probably had a pronounced effect on the resulting charge. Support staff always gets the shaft when it comes to history glamor.
    Last edited by antisocialmunky; 06-17-2009 at 02:49.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  18. #18
    ERROR READING USER PROFILE Member AqD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    112

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyrus View Post
    Hello again everybody!
    After a long break from EB I've decided to come back, but first I have a question that has been on my mind for quite a while: how exactly would a stirrup-less rider cope with the impact?
    There is no impact to cope with for most cavalrymen.

    Just run into enemies and they'd be scared, trying to run away, and get cut down!

  19. #19
    Satalextos Basileus Seron Member satalexton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,180

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    no one with the right mind would charge into a solid wall of pointies, with steadfast and prepared men behind...




    "ΜΗΔΕΝ ΕΩΡΑΚΕΝΑΙ ΦΟΒΕΡΩΤΕΡΟΝ ΚΑΙ ΔΕΙΝΟΤΕΡΟΝ ΦΑΛΑΓΓΟΣ ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΙΚΗΣ" -Lucius Aemilius Paullus

  20. #20
    Member Member Chris1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Posts
    338

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    Breaking steady formed infantry with cavalry is an almost no no in any era, other factors have to be appllied. Suprise, missle disruption, terrain disruption, morale failure etc as antisocialmonkey says artillery in the Napoleonic era. Look at the failure of two of the finest cavalry forces of the era the Prussians at Auerstadt and the French at Waterloo when infantry were not suitably disrupted by artillery or infantry fire.
    "Tell them I said something......"
    Pancho Villa
    Completed; Rome AD14!

  21. #21

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    I agree, Charging into a Pikewall of absolutely steady and absolutely diciplined soldiers is highly ineffective to say the least, unless, you're in a Tank ;)

    If charging from the front The defender has to be disrupted(most commonly through Moral). Winged Hussars were a very fierce force, especially with their utterly stylish wings^^. This helped the Polish to demoralize and Disrupt enemy formations and beat them the good ole Knight way. and Polish Winged hussars were heavy cavalry whereas normal hussars were light cavalry. at least after the decline of the super heavy European Knights. and look at The Ultra heavy Cataphrakts from EB: Givpanvar with their Badass Mail veil and Baktians with thier Lion masks. Or chariots, If the infantry would stand ground the horses would be turned into Kebab. one has to imagine a (enemy) horse galloping towards you the Rider in a martial costume pointing a long sharp stick at you, I think many people would forget that they won't be harmed if they all stay put and run away. If you're inner life consists of the digestion, you can achieve quite a lot in military, ask the spartans^^
    "Who fights can lose, who doesn't fight has already lost."
    - Pyrrhus of Epirus

    "Durch diese hohle Gasse muss er kommen..."
    - Leonidas of Sparta

    "People called Romanes they go the House"
    - Alaric the Visigoth

  22. #22
    Member Member Chris1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Posts
    338

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    In the town where I live we had many carnivals where military units from the British armed forces took part. On one memorable occasion we had a couple of squadrons of the household cavalry in the parade. Put bluntly big men on big horses in full regalia, you would have to be well trained bloody disciplined infantry if 3-400 of them were thundering at you with unpleasantness in mind!
    "Tell them I said something......"
    Pancho Villa
    Completed; Rome AD14!

  23. #23
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    Quote Originally Posted by Ca Putt View Post
    I agree, Charging into a Pikewall of absolutely steady and absolutely diciplined soldiers is highly ineffective to say the least, unless, you're in a Tank ;)
    There was one battle where one of the Polish Hussars reported that his company had charged the same point in the enemy lines 8-10 times before the enemy broke.

    If charging from the front The defender has to be disrupted(most commonly through Moral). Winged Hussars were a very fierce force, especially with their utterly stylish wings
    That's why they painted their horses bright red and even green if a few reports are correct.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  24. #24

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    Quote Originally Posted by antisocialmunky View Post
    They managed to do it fairly often I believe. Certainly more than enough times to chalk it up to luck or coincidence. Again and again, they managed to literally just charge through enemy formations. Sometimes the Hussars managed to break the enemy with their initial charge and rout their opponents before.

    http://www.kismeta.com/diGrasse/HowHussarFought.htm

    This is a pretty in depth read on how winged Hussars managed to break pike and musket formations. I would take the calculations with a grain of salt but it does provide a good summary.

    Long story short, they used a combination of a very dense formation and extremely long lances to plow through a formation supplemented with excellent training and very high morale. The artistic depictions of winged hussars in a charge many times depict them in a running pike wall formation.

    What's probably less commented on is the role of artillery and missile fire to help disupt enemy formations so the Hussars could plow through them. Just like Napoleon's use of the column of attack, artillery probably had a pronounced effect on the resulting charge. Support staff always gets the shaft when it comes to history glamor.
    Interesting read, kind of a documentation of the demise of cavaly vs gunfire though, i imagine that riflemen/musketiers became more highly trained, enabling them to release more powerfull volleys at closer range over time. Reducing the need for pikes with the advance of technology. Don't quite understand why it went back to sabres in napoleonic times, (apart from the uhlans). Unless it was more geared toward cavalry vs cavaly.

    Obviously the poles over analised their cavalry charges a bit much. Instead of sticking with new age weapons (hence the demise of their empire maybe?).
    Last edited by Ezephkiel; 06-18-2009 at 02:21.

  25. #25
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    It wasn't a matter of training, it was an issue of technology finally obsoleting massed cavalry formations. Later cavalry used swords because they ran into already disordered/loose order troops to hack them to bits and run out instead of charging a formation.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  26. #26
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    Far as I know the talk about the Husaria being able to frontally charge pikemen is total national-romanticist bull. Unless they actually managed to scare the footsloggers so witless they broke ranks and fled in face of the charge that is, but I frankly doubt it.

    Bluntly put, the Polish lancers flat out didn't have the nigh-invulnerable degree of armouring on man and horse alike that enabled the heavy lancers of Western Europe to occasionally punch through pike blocks (French gendarmes at least are known to have managed it on a few occasions).

    Rather, the fast-moving comparatively lightly armed Poles did the smart thing and flanked. The standard MO was to first rout the enemy cavalry on the flanks while a small force of cavalry "masked" the pikes (ie. hung withing striking distance so they couldn't turn their flanks to them) and then cheerfully converged on the now isolated and rather demoralised infantry from all directions.
    Which unsurprisingly tended to result in a wholesale collapse.
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  27. #27

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    Far as I know the talk about the Husaria being able to frontally charge pikemen is total national-romanticist bull. Unless they actually managed to scare the footsloggers so witless they broke ranks and fled in face of the charge that is, but I frankly doubt it.

    Bluntly put, the Polish lancers flat out didn't have the nigh-invulnerable degree of armouring on man and horse alike that enabled the heavy lancers of Western Europe to occasionally punch through pike blocks (French gendarmes at least are known to have managed it on a few occasions).

    There are examples of breaking through steady (not disrupted) pike formations in such battles like Klushino or Kircholm.

    The Poles achieved this thanks to very long & very light lances (up to over 6 meters long - there is an original Hussar lance 498 cm long and only 2,425 kg heavy in the National Museum in Cracow if you want to see it) as well as innovative tactics of using them.

    Those lances were so light because their production technology was special and they were empty inside (like bamboo).

    With so long lances Hussars were able to hit enemy pikemen before the pikemen could hit them.

    This doesn't mean that charging pikemen was bloodless, however. Especially horses were exposed to casualties.

    But Hussars & their horses were so well trained, that while charging at full speed they could stop and turn their horses literally in place. This helped in reducing losses against pikes - after destroying the first line of enemy pikemen thanks to long lances, there was still untouched 2nd line of pikemen behind them - and also 3rd, 4th, etc. This is why Hussars often needed to carry out several charges to defeat a single enemy pikemen unit.

    Regarding efficiency of those long lances:

    There are sourced examples of impaling several enemies by one Hussar lance (the record is 6 men impaled by one lance; 2 - 3 was common).

    Of course such a lance was a "one-shot" weapon (it always got broken when striking). That's why Polish army always transported a considerable stockpile of lances. Each Hussar had to have at least few lances for each battle. And Hussar's lance, despite being "one-shot", was a very expensive weapon - it was even few (up to 9) times more expensive than pike. There were cheaper lances in use, but much shorter (ca. 3 - 3,5 m).

    Those shorter lances were usually being used by Hussars when it was not necessary to use those long and expensive.

    At Klushino - where some Hussar banners (companies) charged even 10 times - there was shortage of lances by the end of the battle.

    But of course long lances and "short" lances were not the only weapons Hussars used. They had a great variety of weapons for their disposal.

    Certainly also pistols were useful against pikemen (after charges Hussars used to conduct a bit of "skirmish warfare" against pikemen).

    Polish Winged Hussars even charged and broke through pikewalls.
    Everyone had their brief and/or single moments of glory. The question is, how common was it for them to to such thing? Winged Hussars did not armour their horses, unlike their early contemporaries (gendarmes were eclipsing when winged hussars were just rising), the ultra-heavy French gendarmes. Now, by the Hussar's time (primarily 17th century), armour was becoming lighter and ever more sparse, so their unarmoured horses were the only norm, but still, I am wondering. Such as when that incident happened, when the hussars broke through pikes. And how the pikes were deployed. Too many variables here.
    Check this (excellent read on the battle of Klushino - in English):

    http://www.radoslawsikora.republika....ly/Kluszyn.pdf

    There is an example of breaking enemy pike formation by a frontal charge of Hussars in this battle.

    Although it is possible that those pikemen were a little bit demoralised yet by previous combats.

    There is also an example of a Hussar banner (ca. 150 men) charging frontally a 400 men strong pike-musket regiment 3 times without success. However, in those 3 charges, Hussars suffered relatively minimal casualties, while this infantry regiment lost even up to 50 men killed.

    Plus conditions were unfavourable, because that regiment of 400 men was deployed behind fences (which were obstacles for cavalry).

    Anyway - it seems that even when Hussars were unable to immediately break enemy pike-musket formation, they were still able to frontally charge it without suffering heavy losses. So they were somehow able to reduce their own casualties to minimum even while charging pikemen.

    This must have had a crushing effect on morale - seeing how cavalry repeatedly charges your pike wall without suffering much harm...

    I suppose - as I already wrote above - that Hussars were striking only the first line of enemy pikemen with their lances (as the result of which the first line was being "lanced down"). And after doing so, they were immediately halting their horses & turning back - in order not to fell into second line of enemy pikemen. At this point they were also conducting some "skirmish warfare" firing to pikemen from close distance with their pistols.

    Then further lines of Hussars could "lance down" further lines of pikemen (as we know, the first line of Hussars already broke their lances).

    And if further lines of Hussars also lost their lances - then the entire company could withdraw, take new lances, and charge again later.

    Another thing is that in close, hand 2 hand combat, a Hussar with - let's say - a piece of already broken lance or a broadsword / sabre - probably has an advantage over a pikemen, whose pike is far too long and far too heavy to do any fencing or any blows / parrying enemy blows using it.

    So a Hussar - already in close combat (after charge), using broadsword could probably repel or even cut to pieces enemy wooden pike. Anyway - avoiding being hit by pike in close combat is not such a hard thing (that's why infantry with swords is > infantry with spears / pikes).

    Of course in instances when it was possible, I guess even Hussars prefered to outflank pikemen rather than charge frontally. But for an enemy who didn't know Hussars' tactics & abilities, a frontal charge against pikes could be more surprising than even most brilliant flanking maneuver...

    =================================================================

    Edit:

    There is also an example of a Hussar banner (ca. 150 men) charging frontally a 400 men strong pike-musket regiment 3 times without success. However, in those 3 charges, Hussars suffered relatively minimal casualties, while this infantry regiment lost even up to 50 men killed.

    Plus conditions were unfavourable, because that regiment of 400 men was deployed behind fences (which were obstacles for cavalry).

    Anyway - it seems that even when Hussars were unable to immediately break enemy pike-musket formation, they were still able to frontally charge it without suffering heavy losses. So they were somehow able to reduce their own casualties to minimum even while charging pikemen.
    In the battle of Klushino (1610) a Polish banner of Husaria under command of Mikolaj Strus (ca. 140 - 180 soldiers) charged frontally 3 times against a German pike-musket infantry regiment consisting of 5 companies (ca. 400 soldiers) and protected by fences, under Reinhold Taube:



    In 3 charges the Poles were unable to smash Taube's infantry completely, but killed even up to 50 Germans, while their own losses were relatively small.

    In entire battle (not only in this one engagement against Taube's regiment, also in combats against enemy cavalry - but majority of casualties were most probably suffered in these 3 charges against Taube's infantry) Mikolaj Strus' banner of 140 - 180 soldiers lost:

    Soldiers:

    - 2 killed
    - 9 wounded
    - 1 missing

    Horses:

    - 20 killed
    - 7 wounded
    - 1 missing

    One of Hussars - Porycki - lost 2 horses to enemy musket fire (and after each charge replaced the lost horse by another one), but personally didn't suffer any injuries. After each charge, Hussars were conducting a little bit of "skirmish warfare" against this regiment from close distance, also using pistols.

    Aditionally, some (if not most) of casualties among horses were caused by enemy pikes - not muskets - because Hussars were "charging against pikes / jumping on enemy pikes (probably from side) in order to break them" (after pikes were broken, enemy infantry was almost defenceless against cavalry - but breaking pikes cost some casualties among horses).

    Moreover, that charge was conducted in very difficult conditions because charging horses had to destroy or jump over the fences first and then - after destroying or jumping over the fences - were encountering enemy pikemen with musketers deployed behind those fences.
    Last edited by Domen; 05-16-2011 at 01:57.

  28. #28

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    It wasn't a matter of training, it was an issue of technology finally obsoleting massed cavalry formations.

    But traditional cavalry was obsoletted by technology not before late 19th century - the introduction of machine guns & bolt-action rifles.

    After all in the Napoleonic Wars and also later (even in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870 - 1871) heavy cavalry (Cuirassiers) was still used, and was often successful on the battlefield vs infantry, despite its supposedly increasing rate of fire and - to a much smaller extent - accuracy.

    Just to mention the devastating (for enemy infantry) charge of Prussian cavalry at Mars-la-Tour and Gravelotte in 1871.

    Or another example (a bit earlier) - the battle of Striegau of 1745 in which a cavalry charge carried out by the Bayeruth dragoon regiment (10 squadrons) in some 15 - 20 minutes disrupted a many times numerically superior enemy force of 20 battalions of fusiliers and 14 companies of grenadiers, capturing 2500 prisoners and 5 artillery guns.

    While the decline of Husaria was in 18th century - 100 years before heavy cavalry as such was definitely obsoletted.

    So it was not caused by technology, even if technology could be one of factors causing that decline.

    Radoslaw Sikora - author of the above linked article about Klushino in English (he also wrote entire book about this battle but in Polish) explains the reasons why Husaria declined while for example Cuirassiers survived for the next 100 years in one of his books.

    The primary reason of decline of Husaria was huge decline of its own quality and quantity. Not improvement of enemy technology.

    Plus Husaria was always an expensive formation (this was a price for its awesome efficiency) with very limited manpower recruiting base. The biggest amount of Hussars serving in the Polish army at one time was 8,000 - but this was really "the peak of all peaks" of its strength.

    Yet for most part of the second half of 17th century number of Hussars in entire Poland only occasionally exceeded 1,000.

    For the battle of Warsaw in 1656, Poles were able to deploy only ca. 800 Hussars. No surprise they couldn't change the course of the battle (despite the fact that their lonely charge against much more numerous Swedes - without support from other Polish troops - initially succeeded).

    It was during the reign of Jan III Sobieski (and the battle of Vienna in 1683) when their number once again approached over 3,000.

    After Sobieski it was yet only worse - not only quantity rapidly decreased, but also quality of training, command and everything else.

    But during the Great Northern War Husaria still had some combat value (and proved this in the battle of Kalisz in 1706).

    In the battle of Klissow in 1702 only 260 Hussars actually carried out a reconnaissance charge (not a real attack), which was halted by anti-cavalry obstacles - not by musket fire. After that, the Polish commander ordered his forces to retreat - they did not take part in the battle.

    Only the times of August III Sas (1733 - 1763) saw the final and embarrassing decline of Winged Hussars.

    After August III Sas, Husaria existed for a few more years until 1770s, but was used only during parades and funerals... Even soldiers of other types of Polish cavalry at that time (1750s+) laughed at Husaria calling it "funeral cavalry", instead of admiring it as it always had been before.

    In 1776 (if I remember correctly) - during reforms of the Polish army - Husaria was finally dissolved as a military formation.

    ============================================

    Check this (excellent read on the battle of Klushino - in English):

    http://www.radoslawsikora.republika....ly/Kluszyn.pdf
    Here also links to a few more articles of dr. R. Sikora in English (the link to his "How the Hussars Fought" article was already given):

    Battle of Lubar 1660 (one part of this article is dealing with "How did hussars charge?" issue basing on good sources):

    http://www.radoslawsikora.republika....aly/Liubar.pdf

    Author also proves that Hussars while charging were able to alter (loosen / tighten their ranks) their formation.

    Battle of Chocim 1621 (here explanation why Turkish armies were always so massive. Answer: they were THAT massive only "on paper"):

    http://www.radoslawsikora.republika....Chocim1621.pdf

    Winged Hussars at Vienna part 1:

    http://www.radoslawsikora.republika....ly/Vienna1.pdf

    Painted horses of Winged Hussars:

    http://www.radoslawsikora.republika....ntedhorses.pdf

    Battlefields of Winged Hussars (mainly photos and maps):

    http://www.radoslawsikora.republika....ttlefields.pdf
    Last edited by Domen; 05-16-2011 at 02:39.

  29. #29

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    What's with the thread necromancy? s:

  30. #30

    Default Re: Cavalry charges

    Thread necromancy is better than spamming new threads about the same.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO