Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Safford Unified v Redding

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Safford Unified v Redding

    Quote Originally Posted by Tribesman View Post


    So it was an unreasonable search but the people doing it didn't do an unreasonable search because of established law.
    No more the search was illegal but not stupid enough for the officals to be sued for everything they're worth.
    When it occurs to a man that nature does not regard him as important and that she feels she would not maim the universe by disposing of him, he at first wishes to throw bricks at the temple, and he hates deeply the fact that there are no bricks and no temples
    -Stephen Crane

  2. #2

    Default Re: Safford Unified v Redding

    No more the search was illegal but not stupid enough for the officals to be sued for everything they're worth.
    Yesterday 08:43

  3. #3
    Master of Few Words Senior Member KukriKhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,415

    Default Re: Safford Unified v Redding

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Winter View Post
    No more the search was illegal but not stupid enough for the officals to be sued for everything they're worth.
    The officials were granted Qualified Immunity, shielding them personally from liability. However, the School District is still open to civil damages, which could be substantial.
    Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO