Mafia Mongolica [Concluded]

**Tratorix** · 07-21-2009, 21:09

How are they suspicious? All I've seen from you on this is the fact that ATPG voted for someone other than Beskar and Micheal Jackson lyrics. Honestly lynching Beskar because there are "no better choices" is unsatisfactory in itself, but wanting to lynch ATPG because he voted to save someone you want to lynch because you can't find anyone better? Strikes me as lazy at best and scummy at worst.

**Reenk Roink** · 07-21-2009, 22:24

Originally Posted by Tratorix

How are they suspicious? All I've seen from you on this is the fact that ATPG voted for someone other than Beskar and Micheal Jackson lyrics. Honestly lynching Beskar because there are "no better choices" is unsatisfactory in itself, but wanting to lynch ATPG because he voted to save someone you want to lynch because you can't find anyone better? Strikes me as lazy at best and scummy at worst.

You haven't been looking too hard then. Atpg before saving Beskar this round twice went after GH for voting Beskar. One with some joke post I think, and the other with a vote without any reason. There's clearly a connection between the two. You're simply being reactive to someone trying to be proactive...

These have been pointed out before by me. You're falling into the same scheme of simply saying "Oh Reenk is just posting Michael Jackson lyrics" when that's clearly not true. Lazy at best, scummy at worst...

Disagree with the case given. Don't try to pretend there isn't one.

Lastly, I've asked you for any suggestions on whom to lynch. Your vote against Beefy seems to contradict everything you've been saying here, so I'm not sure. Given your involvement in the game, the fact that you are simply OK with criticizing any attempt at Beskar and Atpg while not promoting any other alternative is odd...

**Beskar** · 07-21-2009, 23:20

The answer is obvious, the best alternative is you. You acted scummy since round one.

I haven't got a clue why Pizza decided to want to save me, maybe it was because I purposely didn't change vote and thus, allowed him to continue in the game, and he felt being on the receiving end of a poor bandwagon, he decided to repay the favour. If that is the case, my thanks to Pizza, I will remember it. There hasn't been any out of thread communication between me and Pizza either, as I said before this statement, maybe he was just repaying the favour where I helped stop him getting needlessly lynched.

How is that scummy? All I have done is simply point out really weird actions, which I done in every single game, and because I decided to point out Reenk Roink's behaviour, RR just tries to bandwagon me with post-hoc information, where he tries to build an imaginary case up, all because I called him out on his behaviour.

Remember, RR's vote is because I called him out on being suspicious, and his whole active bandwagon is his paranoia because I called him out.

So you want the alternatives who to vote for?:

Reenk Roink
The Lurkers (Such as Ichigo and Kazaar, etc)

If the town wants to win, it needs to work together,, not boil down into spitting contests due to ignorance.

edit: Apologises about my earlier post this morning, I just got annoyed. Thanks to Sigurd for changing his vote from me, admittedly, if I was him, I would be tempted to keep it on. Sorry to Beefy182, I didn't see the case against you, and just to let you know, I wouldn't have put my vote on you if I didn't have to.

**Reenk Roink** · 07-21-2009, 23:52

Originally Posted by Beskar

The answer is obvious, the best alternative is you. You acted scummy since round one.

I was speaking with Tratorix here, if he really thought so then, why did he vote for Beefy? I had two votes on me at that point.

How is that scummy? All I have done is simply point out really weird actions, which I done in every single game, and because I decided to point out Reenk Roink's behaviour, RR just tries to bandwagon me with post-hoc information, where he tries to build an imaginary case up, all because I called him out on his behaviour.

Ok, despite the many times I pointed out my reasons, you continue with this nonsense of a "post-hoc case" hiding a retaliation vote.

A couple of things, you're really not going to get anyone to lynch anyone due to retaliation votes.

Your entire argument of "post hoc" information fails because your accusation against me that I voted against you because you "called me out" is post hoc.

Obviously I'm making a case against you because you "called me out". It led me to reread the page once more, where I saw the potential connection. Were I just retaliation voting, Sigurd and White eyes would be on The List.

Remember, RR's vote is because I called him out on being suspicious, and his whole active bandwagon is his paranoia because I called him out.