Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Romani cognomen passover?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    urk! Member bobbin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tin Isles
    Posts
    3,668

    Default Re: Romani cognomen passover?

    Its definatley not a bug, quite a nice feature really as I like having a whole dynasty of africanus, gallicus etc.


  2. #2
    Member Megas Methuselah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Prairie Grasslands
    Posts
    5,040

    Thumbs up Re: Romani cognomen passover?

    Quote Originally Posted by bobbin View Post
    Its definatley not a bug, quite a nice feature really as I like having a whole dynasty of africanus, gallicus etc.
    It's quite cool, I think, and adds a new level of uniqueness to the family tree.

  3. #3
    lictor Member Urg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    138

    Default Re: Romani cognomen passover?

    I had a Macedonicus in a Romani campaign, whose son was Macedonicus too.

    I don't think its too unhistorical. Scipio Africanus' son was named Africanus (his grandson took the name also, but after conquering Carthage was entitled to the name in his own right). The other example I could find was P. Servilius Vatia Isauricus whose son took the same name.

    However there are plenty more historical examples of sons not taking 'victory' agnomina from their fathers, eg. Q. Caecilius Metellus Numidicus, Q. Caecilius Metellus Macedonicus, Q. Caecilius Metellus Balearicus, M. Antonius Creticus.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO