Results 1 to 30 of 42

Thread: ACIN's procreation problem...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    EB TRIBVNVS PLEBIS Member MarcusAureliusAntoninus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The State of Jefferson, USA
    Posts
    5,722

    Default Re: ACIN's procreation problem...

    Quote Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name View Post
    At this point I made all my border provinces have lvl 4 gov and made a local ruler in each. Does this affect the birth rate?
    Yeah, every client ruler will count in the total number of family members allowed. If you have tons of recruited generals, you will have less births in your royal family.


  2. #2

    Default Re: ACIN's procreation problem...

    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusAureliusAntoninus View Post
    Yeah, every client ruler will count in the total number of family members allowed. If you have tons of recruited generals, you will have less births in your royal family.
    ahh, shoot I have over loaded on them since the beginning of my campaign.


  3. #3
    Keeper of the Pax Romanum Member TruePraetorian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Romeo MI (US)
    Posts
    885

    Default Re: ACIN's procreation problem...

    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusAureliusAntoninus View Post
    Yeah, every client ruler will count in the total number of family members allowed. If you have tons of recruited generals, you will have less births in your royal family.
    I don't think this is entirely true considering in my Casse campiagn I have 3 settlements, 2 client rulers, and 6 family members...do you have any proof for this? It interests me

    Also, if a faction hordes they gain a set amount of family members although they would not possess any settlements. Therefore, a hordeing faction also negates this.

    Or it could just be BI.exe, since that is what I use..
    The Gods envy us.

    They envy us because we are mortal, because any moment might be our last.
    Everything is more beautiful because we are doomed.
    You will never be lovlier than you are now.

    We will never be here again.

  4. #4
    EB TRIBVNVS PLEBIS Member MarcusAureliusAntoninus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The State of Jefferson, USA
    Posts
    5,722

    Default Re: ACIN's procreation problem...

    If you have none or very few settlements, you will have more family members than settlements. That 1:1 ratio only really takes effect if you have somewhere around more than five settlements.


  5. #5
    Keeper of the Pax Romanum Member TruePraetorian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Romeo MI (US)
    Posts
    885

    Default Re: ACIN's procreation problem...

    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusAureliusAntoninus View Post
    If you have none or very few settlements, you will have more family members than settlements. That 1:1 ratio only really takes effect if you have somewhere around more than five settlements.
    Makes sense. Honestly though I can account for a few games where I've had too many family members/client rulers instead of a shortage so the percent chance must just drop instead of becoming null, am I correct?

    In other words you can still have kids even if there is a 20:1 ratio of family to settlements but the odds are very low?
    The Gods envy us.

    They envy us because we are mortal, because any moment might be our last.
    Everything is more beautiful because we are doomed.
    You will never be lovlier than you are now.

    We will never be here again.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO