Why should any individual follow the law instead of, say, the writings of Douglas Adams?I wasn't talking about moral beliefs, I'm talking about epistemology, I had in mind the argument Reformed folks use with presuppositionalism - so in other words why should ATPG's belief in the inherent truthfulness of logic or science form the basis of the laws by which people who presuppose the truthfulness of, say the Bible, be judged? I was kind of hoping Reenk might come in to take over from here on, he's the expert on that stuff, I'm a noob at it but I'm going to try to learn...
Your argument is absurd to anyone but a fanatic.
Bookmarks