Jury In: America DEFINTELY NOT MOST FREE COUNTRY

**Sasaki Kojiro** · 09-24-2009, 04:07

Havn't most of the laws been loosened up? A judge overturned the charge on the people in the op.

**Aemilius Paulus** · 09-24-2009, 04:28

Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro

Havn't most of the laws been loosened up? A judge overturned the charge on the people in the op.

Read the two Economist articles I posted. They should answer your question better than anything else I can think of.

**Lemur** · 09-24-2009, 05:25

Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro

Havn't most of the laws been loosened up?

No.

**Fragony** · 09-24-2009, 06:51

Complete and utter insanity. Why do people do things like this, they must know that nothing is going on, but can we charge them anyway? Yes we can! Rapist mentality it's all about power.

**Shaka_Khan** · 09-24-2009, 08:47

What about nude pictures of me when I was a baby?

**Ja'chyra** · 09-24-2009, 09:09

Originally Posted by Shaka_Khan

What about nude pictures of me when I was a baby?

Shudders

**Aemilius Paulus** · 09-24-2009, 09:14

Originally Posted by Cute Wolf

Alias : Quintus Fabius

Bah, traitor

Originally Posted by Cute Wolf

Hair : Brown
Eye : Blue-grey
Height : 6'2"
Weight : 167 lb

Corrected

Originally Posted by Shaka_Khan

What about nude pictures of me when I was a baby?

Who wants to see mine?? Imma' auctioning them off for balloons! Heh, is true that individual get arrested for simply possessing child pornography? Then why haven't more people tried to plant such things? And why is it that pure possession of such material is prosecuted? I mean, if you distribute or create the crap, then yes, but simply posses it? So I suppose it is a serious felony, eh?

**HoreTore** · 09-24-2009, 10:53

Originally Posted by Aemilius Paulus

Who wants to see mine?? Imma' auctioning them off for balloons! Heh, is true that individual get arrested for simply possessing child pornography? Then why haven't more people tried to plant such things? And why is it that pure possession of such material is prosecuted? I mean, if you distribute or create the crap, then yes, but simply posses it? So I suppose it is a serious felony, eh?

Because real child pornography(it really should be called "child rape material" or something) always comes from rape and abuse of children. And that's illegal. If you didn't commit the abuse yourself, then you supported the guy who did it by getting his photo's, and a lot of it wouldn't be committed if there wasn't a market for it.

**Centurion1** · 09-25-2009, 02:59

OP case is simply retardation.

AP of course people with real child pornography have to be punished. There is no excuse for REAL child pornography. The fact is that the bath time photos were not pornography. Real child pornography is sick and can in no way be tolerated.

In some ways i wish protection laws to be stricter especially in cases like rape and molesting. However, they need to judge cases more individually so that these poor kids don't get the rest of thewir lives ruined for having sex with girls their own age. (whether they should be having sex is a whole nother thing, but as long as it is consensual and is not rape or similar ilk they should not be receiving sex offender status)