Indefinite Bannings

**Askthepizzaguy** · 10-27-2009, 16:55

Originally Posted by Monk

This thread is normally saved for people who are banned so hard they aren't even allowed to look in the window while logged in.

You mean the.... *gasp* ....SUPER banned people?

What happens when you are Super Banned:

1. TosaInu personally comes to your house and physically takes away your computer. Then he hits it with a brick.

2. A guy deletes your profile and replaces it a page that contains nothing more than a .gif animation of Roseanne Barr dancing the macarena in a thong. Next to your grandmother, who is doing the same thing.

3. Ser Clegane opens up your wallet and clips up all your credit cards. Just because he can.

4. Your avatar is replaced by a bootleg drawing of Calvin peeing on your previous avatar.

5. They call the IRS about the back taxes you owe, and then plant cocaine in your car and tip off the police. Also, they slap a monkey. I am not sure why.

6. Something so terrible it shall not be named. Ok, it shall be named "the big frankfurter", and I really gotta tell ya, it isn't pleasant.

7. They cut the brakes on your car. But they are not monsters, they also slash all your tires.

8. You know that photo of you when you were thirteen and you had braces and a really, really honking pimple? Well now everyone does. Especially that girl you were hitting on. She hates you now.

**Prussian to the Iron** · 10-27-2009, 17:14

oh how i wish i could siggy that!

**Askthepizzaguy** · 10-27-2009, 17:15

You could always sig this:

User was SUPER BANNED for this post.

**Ser Clegane** · 10-27-2009, 17:17

Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy

6. Something so terrible it shall not be named. Ok, it shall be named "the big frankfurter", and I really gotta tell ya, it isn't pleasant.

BTW, it is pure coincidence that I am from Frankfurt.

or is it?

**Askthepizzaguy** · 10-27-2009, 17:21

9. After experiencing the horror of "the big frankfurter", you're required by law to affectionately refer to Ser Clegane as "big daddy frankfurter".

**Monk** · 10-27-2009, 17:27

You forgot the part where i hit you in the knee.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read:

**Prussian to the Iron** · 10-27-2009, 18:10

lol i think that episode is on tonight!!!

oh, you forgot 10:

10. You are forced to play Limbo fo the Lost 5 times

this step is meant to rob you of your sanity.

full "walkthrough/review" here http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?t=400406

**Subotan** · 11-03-2009, 00:16

Originally Posted by Prussian Iron

10. You are forced to play Limbo fo the Lost 5 times

this step is meant to rob you of your sanity.

full "walkthrough/review" here http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?t=400406

That is actually horrifying.

**Prussian to the Iron** · 11-03-2009, 01:14

Originally Posted by Subotan

That is actually horrifying.

it truly is. after reading the thread, I tried to read my schoolbooks; i just kept seeing slightly noticable white lettering on a white background. this may actually be a medical condition caused by this game.

"Um, sir...I don't know how to tell you this, but you've got Pixelbitching syndrome"
"Are you sure?"
"Without a doubt."
"...Oh man.....what am I gonna tell my wife? My boss?"
"I'm...so sorry."

**Subotan** · 03-15-2010, 13:12

The circumstances of AP's ban are nowhere near bad enough to warrant a perma-ban. The only privacy violated was Secura's, and that wasn't by AP. Once again, the assertion that the mods have one rule for some Orgahs and another for the others has been proved true. It also appears that the mods have a chronic context deficiency.

**TinCow** · 03-15-2010, 13:28

Originally Posted by Subotan

The only privacy violated was Secura's

Incorrect

**KukriKhan** · 03-15-2010, 13:52

Originally Posted by Subotan

It also appears that the mods have a chronic context deficiency.

Yeah... it's that pesky iron-y deficiency.

Prescribed treatment: Persistent Privacy Protection.

**CountArach** · 03-15-2010, 14:00

Originally Posted by Subotan

The circumstances of AP's ban are nowhere near bad enough to warrant a perma-ban. The only privacy violated was Secura's, and that wasn't by AP. Once again, the assertion that the mods have one rule for some Orgahs and another for the others has been proved true. It also appears that the mods have a chronic context deficiency.

So AP was openly stating ALL OVER THE SITE that he was violating the privacy of members, that he openly stated that he had dirt on at least one member (not Secura, as you claim) and made a point of singling Secura out as one whose privacy could easily be breached (thus at the very least implying that he had some experience in the field) and yet he had nothing at all to do with it? We weighed everything up for as long as we felt necessary and in that time the evidence continued piling up. AP joined the forum fully aware that breaching the privacy of members was a bannable offence and the fact that he did this so flagrantly clearly warrants a ban.

As much as it may appear at times that we pick on the EB Taverners, it is only because they are the ones so consistently breaking the forum rules. Constant violations of rules means harsher crack-downs and this has always been the case across the entire board, even before the group was formed. When so many individuals of a related group are constantly making a game out of toeing the line and trolling the entire forum, harsh measures are called for against that group. Several of the members seem to feed off each other's trolling and attempt to outdo each other and this is not at all the sort of behaviour that this site wishes to have amongst its members.

NOTE: This is not me speaking for all moderators, this is my own opinion. As much as you may like to think it, we are not some group-think program and we do disagree on several things.

EDIT: Oh, and if you really do believe that AP had nothing to do with the breaching of Secura's privacy would you care to tell me how he knew that her privacy had been breached and, if he knew, why he did not raise the issue directly with Moderators so we could take steps to ban the real culprit?