
Originally Posted by
Prussian Iron
much more disturbing; here is what happens in that scene in WaW:
1. WaW takes place 65 years ago.
2. We can detach ourselves from that, because they are "the bad guys"
3. You have to admit that the Sergeant (Reznov?) makes it a little funny
4. Those scenes aren't on such a large scale. there are maybe 2-3 scenes of that? and those scenes are very short, and 3 people and at largest maybe 10 for the scene in the fields where you get molotovs.
No, I do not.
The violence portrayed in WaW was very intense, enough so that even though it took place over six decades ago it had a powerful message: War is ugly. There are also more than three scenes, but listing off the ones I remember wouldn't prove a point. The original point is that WaW encouraging war-crimes is just the same as this imho.
1. It takes place in a post-9/11 world where everyday innocents are killed for no reason by terrorists.
2. You and 4 other terrorists cold-heartedly slaughter hundreds of innocent people in an airport
3. Crawling, mangled people trying to escape are shot
4. The screaming is extremely unnerving.
I'm really failing to see the difference. Was it any less bad when the soviet commander demanded you to kill surrendering germans near the subway, but if you refused he ordered them burned alive with molotovs and mocked you?
The Call of Duty series already took steps down this road in WaW. The only difference this time around is that Infinity Ward seems to understand not everyone wants to interact with this sort of scene, instead of shoe-horning you into the situation and further punishing you if you don't play along like Treyarch did.
Bookmarks