I don't recall anyone accusing him of giving unfair judicial treatment to people based on race or refusing to hear cases between a white and a black man.
What is the difference between him recusing himself and a Priest recusing themselves for the performance of a marriage? They both have state licenses to perform marriages and recuse themselves in that capacity, right? I recognize that there is a distinction and that he can't deny them the ability to marry, but he should be able to direct them elsewhere.
Essentially what you are sayign is that those who work as public officials do not have freedom of conscience.
Last edited by ICantSpellDawg; 11-04-2009 at 17:23.
"That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
-Eric "George Orwell" Blair
"If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
(Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
What's the difference between the president cheating on his wife and a regular man cheating on his wife? Public officials should be held to a higher standard. The state license is not the issue, it's his profession.
If someone won't perform an interracial marriage then the shouldn't judge an interracial court case. Whether or not you recall anyone accusing him of unfairness is inconsequential. That would require those instances to be publicly available, for you to have read them, and for you to remember them
And judges can make terrible decisions, like the guy who sentenced a 16 year old girl to life in prison for killing the man who raped her at 13 and worked her as a prostitute for 3 years (recent case). What if that judge made the decision out of racial prejudice?
I don't object to him recusing himself, but rather to him judging court cases.Essentially what you are sayign is that those who work as public officials do not have freedom of conscience.
Last edited by Sasaki Kojiro; 11-04-2009 at 17:29.
Bookmarks