I've stated my views on the Nobel Peace Prize at length in the relevant thread. I don't feel like repeating myself a billion times, but I suggest you read Jaglands reasoning for giving him the prize, and also take a look at Nobel's will to see what it's actually all about. In short however; yes, Obama has fulfilled all three conditions, and I have yet to see someone who has done more on all three conditions this year. Obama is actually a proper winner, it's the human rights activist winners of the last decade who are the questionable ones.
No offense, but I highly doubt that. Evidence? The Katie Curic interview. Also, what was it she studied again? Communication? I have to confess, I have an extreme prejudice against anyone in that business....
Bookmarks