
Originally Posted by
YLC
Since this is essentially one post, I'll answer both at the same time.
I was voting for GH, when TC jumped on - and immediately jumped off without giving reason why.
TC then responds later in the same said post by saying something about Sasaki that would catch peoples attention - for being idiotic and easily disprovable.
GH is overly defensive when I accuse him, arguing with me instead of simply making a statement, when he knows I am being intentionally unreasonable - he is concerned, and thus has something to prove.
TC and GH bandwagon of each others logic, with TC avoiding me in direct discussion as much as possible, even when he knows that I am asking reasonable questions, rather then unreasonable accusations, like I did with GH. He's not seeing a difference.
Bookmarks