Everyone knows that the south is full of air-heads (I mean, who votes for Boris Johnson?) and limp-wristed accented wussies. While the burly men live in the north.
Everyone knows that the south is full of air-heads (I mean, who votes for Boris Johnson?) and limp-wristed accented wussies. While the burly men live in the north.
Days since the Apocalypse began
"We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
"Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."
I am well aware that there are English nationalists who decry the Union with what they see as the bloodsucking parasites on the periphery. I am not one of them.
I am British. I recognise that the Union has been immensely successful for its component nations. England brought industrial might, Wales some of our finest politicians, Scotland an empire expanding entrepeneurial class, and Ireland some of our finest literature.
But this is a family, and requires public commitment, not public spite to make it work.
I don't blame the SNP, I blame the Scottish Unionist parties (Cons & Lab & Lib-Dem) for a refusing a referendum on Scottish independence, where such a declaration of commitment to the family might be made, and as long as that is denied we are left with the acid drip-drip of spite which weakens the family commitment of all members.
And the junior partners need to remember what allowed Britain (as a whole) to make such a good fist of the sovereign nation state (when our continetal neighbours have made such a balls of it), is its inviolable island geography, which is partly the reason the Union exists in the first place; because England would not tolerate peripheral territories not under its sovereign control to be used as a spring-board for invasion by competing powers.
Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar
Last edited by The Wizard; 02-16-2010 at 18:01.
"It ain't where you're from / it's where you're at."
Eric B. & Rakim, I Know You Got Soul
When you stop cueing you have lost all Britishness.
Understatement is an English thing...I don't think it is becoming of the Scots or and the Irish.
However, apologies? I think the Canadians have the market cornered there... They will apologize to a table for passing too near.
Regionalism is only a family argument, and as one Irish proverb goes; so long as you have family, you will never want for enemies.
Education: that which reveals to the wise,
and conceals from the stupid,
the vast limits of their knowledge.
Mark Twain
This year's Six Nations will turn out to be between France and England.
As a question to all of our Island-dwelling friends, whom do you support? At least, whose triumph would leave you least miserable - the English re-affirming their Divine Right to rule over the entire British Isles, or the frogs showing the Irish and Scots how to keep the rosbifs down?
I would support England of course, they have supported us often enough in the World Cup.
Well, I would if it was football at least, I couldn't care less about such a poor excuse for a sport as rugby.![]()
At the end of the day politics is just trash compared to the Gospel.
Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar
The British identity is a strange one. Waving the Union Flag or shouting "God Save the Queen" will get you funny looks from most Britons and the silent labelling of you by your community as a BNP member. It is most un-British to be vocal in your Britishness.
Multiple identities confuse the problem even more. It's OK to wave the Red Dragon or St. Andrew's Saltire, but it's more difficult with St. George's. That's a symptom of the root phenomenon mentioned in the initial post, the mistrust some English have with Celtic Nationalism.
To be English is to simultaneously be British; the two are near inseparable, and to denounce one is to denounce both. And yet in Scotland and Wales, there are British citizens expressing pride in their Celtic identity, seemingly at the expense of their British identity. Maybe some English are jealous of this, as to do the same to their English identity is impossible. Of course, there's probably a lot of "outsider" sentiment, as an English pensioner I met who disliked Scots for the sin of being Scottish clearly had.
I identify with all of these (but then they may just be qualities that everyone likes to think he possesses). And yet I'm a half Catholic Irish, half Protestant Settler born in Belfast living in England. Does that make me British? Or does my background exclude me from being British? Or maybe I'm just half-British.
I've derived a series of identities for myself which I all consider myselef to be, and which are useful when dealing with the minefield that is extended Northern Irish Catholic family relations. I consider myself ethnically Irish but culturally British. I hold a passport for both (I hold the Irish one for the neutrality thing), and yet I identify primarily as a European, and that's how I answer when asked. Thanks to this complicated set up, I am hated by extremists of all the nationalities.
Some of us are still carrying that particular torch.![]()
Bookmarks