Treaty of Versailles - Modern Reappraisal

[Husar]

The Kaiser did not want war and did the most of any of the world leaders to avoid it, unlike French leaders who were fueled by Revanchism - an extreme over reaction to the loss of the war they started and lost in 1871.

Are you kidding? He didn't want a two-front war all that much but he had been trying to surpass the british fleet for years, gave the Austrians that blanket support I mentioned and didn't care about any alliances other than with Austria for reasons I cannot understand, he wanted Germany to have "a place under the sun", started aggressive politics, insulted several leaders of other countries and happily participated in gunboat diplomacy. Had he not wanted a war or aggression, he would have kept Bismarck instead of throwing him out.

No it isn't. It is comparable to beggars cannot be choosers, as in, they got nothing and cannot get anything, so when they are given something to eat, they take it. They can't really turn it down and ask for Marks and Spencers. Germany was in no position to get better terms, and it would have ended up in a far worse situation, with far harsher terms if it rejected, so if they wanted a lenient peace treaty, which Louis has kindly pointed out in his 21 points, they would have to accept it, or face worse.

In comparison to the example you gave, Jews aren't bad, therefore it is not comparable in the slightest as your example is fundamentally flawed, unless you are again, trying to make a statement which would warrant warning/infraction points. So I would highly recommend at least attempting to try using other examples.

So you're perfectly fine with the way the SS ended the Warsaw uprising because the Jews lost the fight and losers can't be choosers? The jews also lost the elections to Hitler(not like there was a jewish party but they could have voted and campaigned for someone else) so they had it all coming as losers can't be choosers, yanno, I can go on and justify anything with that little sentence.
And you also think that there are beggars in the streets is perfectly fine?
Of course "Losers can't be choosers" is a reality, as I said before, but using the sentence to justify anything is opening Pandora's box, the guys in Gitmo also lost a fistfight to some CIA agents, so guess we shouldn't complain about them being there "Losers can't be choosers" after all...