Quote Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy View Post
I think that's plenty of time to see where people stand. If you're going to actually pressure anyone, the vote needs to be closer than it is. It would also be really easy to switch back to No Lynch if we so choose.
Nine hours or so is plenty of time, yes. I'll let you tie up your own seemingly loose-end, but there's a different one that has stood out for me.

unvote; vote: Thermal Mercury

It strikes me as odd that both of your posts are simply votes with no explanation as to your reasons for said vote. I'm a real stick-in-the-mud when it comes to people giving some sort of reasoning behind a vote, you see, so I apologise now for picking you out of the crowd.

Anyway, I can actually understand your vote against AVSM (naughty lurky), but why Renata? Her arguments have been pretty solid from the start, but it also places alot of emphasis upon herself; she stands out for the strength of the argument.

If Renata was mafia, this would be a very, very foolish and risky play, don't you think? Advocating a lynch when the general consensus has been established for the first phase and we're drifting towards no lynch at all?

She is either very foolish scum or a very brave townie. I'm vouching for the latter.