Departed Dethy Mafia II [Concluded]

**Sasaki Kojiro** · 03-07-2010, 18:39

Where were you yesterday double A?

**Double A** · 03-07-2010, 19:13

Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro

Where were you yesterday double A?

You mean Friday? I was sick, and I didn't know where my laptop was. My desktop was infected with that annoying ATI Security XP 2010 virus (...again). And my dad wouldn't let me get on them anyway since he was home sick too (he has bronchitis).

So in short, I didn't have computer acess, and didn't feel like trying.

**johnhughthom** · 03-07-2010, 19:16

Originally Posted by Double A

My desktop was infected with that annoying ATI Security XP 2010 virus (...again).

You been at the porn? (....again).

**Double A** · 03-07-2010, 19:17

Uhm... gah?

**Methos** · 03-07-2010, 22:40

My results on Double A were 'Guilty'. It was just that word, no quote or anything.

**Sasaki Kojiro** · 03-07-2010, 23:14

So:

Methos gets a guilty on Double A
Sasaki gets an innocent on Secura
Secura gets a guilty on Sasaki
Double A gets a guilty on john (known innocent)

Based on the results, either Double is guilty, I am guilty, or one of Secura/Methos/Double A lied. So, we know nothing.

I think getting the results on the deceased is a big benefit to us. If indeed we do get results and Double A isn't lying. We have to make sure we do that, everyone needs to be investigated.

Something like:

Double A investigates Sasaki
Sasaki investigates Double A
Methos investigates Secura
Secura investigates Methos

I'm don't think it makes any difference what order we do it in.

Vote:No lynch

**Secura** · 03-08-2010, 13:44

Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro

Double A investigates Sasaki
Sasaki investigates Double A
Methos investigates Secura
Secura investigates Methos

This isn't good investigating. Say that, hypothetically, Methos was to die; his result on me couldn't be revealed, and my result on him wouldn't carry so much water if he was dead. I think:

Double A investigates Sasaki
Sasaki investigates Methos
Methos investigates Secura
Secura investigates Double A

...is better. The same structure as we had before. I'll send my order for Double A.

**Secura** · 03-07-2010, 23:14

Wow, that is an interesting turn-up for the books.

Our results suggest the following based upon that conclusion:

Paranoid: Secura, Double A, Methos, JHT
Naive: Sasaki, JHT
Insane: Secura, Double A, Methos, JHT
Normal: Sasaki, Methos, Secura, JHT

Naturally we don't know which type of officer JHT was, so we have him down as being a possibility for all four.

**Sasaki Kojiro** · 03-07-2010, 23:17

There can be three guilty's, if the normal cop investigates the mole. Or three innocents if the insane cop does.

**Methos** · 03-07-2010, 23:28

Originally Posted by Secura

Considering we are down an officer, you would have either:

1) One innocent result, two guilty, whichever the fake chose
2) Two innocent results, one guilty, whichever the fake chose.

So this means that either Secura, Double A, or myself is the mafia. My caving day kind of screwed things up, because had the mafia been able to wait, doing a two and two would have kept everyone a suspect. Right now I'm inclined to believe Sasaki is innocent, assuming Secura is correct on the one and three.

Sasaki cannot be the Paranoid or Insane Officer.
Secura cannot be the Naive or Normal Officer.

I disagree. Your conclusion is based on us believing you to be a townie. I'm still hesitant to believe so, so your conclusions have no foundation.

I'm tired and starting to get sore, so I'm not thinking clearly. I do agree with the Vote: No Lynch.