So, it tells us nothing, any of us could be guilty purely from the results. I don't see anything anyway. Even if we each assume we are innocent, it could be either of the other two people.
*******

Originally Posted by
Sasaki
Secura is the mafia.
Vote:Secura
My first post, a vote with no reason given.

Originally Posted by
Secura
I suspected that someone would jump such a foolish conclusion; I hadn't thought that it would be you, Sasaki, of all people.
What is your reasoning behind such a vote? To me, it seems like a scummy attempt to kill someone who's utilising their brain to figure things out. There's no better option this round but to vote for no lynch. You're effectively killing the town's ability to win by doing so... so why would you do that?
I can assure you that I am a simply cop, though I don't believe that will sway you.
Now, look at this post carefully. The main difference between mafia and town in this game is that the mafia know the alignment of other players. When someone accuses them, they know that person is town, and when they accuse someone, they know that person is town.
In the first paragraph, Secura says that she "didn't think I would have jumped to such a foolish conclusion". Only townies jump to conclusions, mafia are making things up. The wording shows that she knows I'm town. And mafia are more likely to be paranoid about someone jumping on their posts than townies are.
Then it's "seems like a scummy attempt", my vote on here is mafioso like, she says. Contradicts the last paragraph.
In a following post:

Originally Posted by
Secura
I found what you said scummy because you were trying to call me out for, quite frankly, flip all.
This is different from what she said at the time. Before she said I was scummy for trying to squash the best plan for the town.
a) it isn't the best plan for the town
b) This is all in response to my "secura is mafia vote:secura" post. Overreacting.

Originally Posted by
Secura
If you lynch me, which isn't going to end the game by the way, then you're left with three people in Day Two. How are you going to win at that point?
This is directed at me as a townie again. She describes a situation that would be tough for the town and says "how are you going to win at that point?".

Originally Posted by
Secura
Also, I realise that I have just revealed my role, but considering I've been labelled as the most suspicious one here, it doesn't really matter to me; I'm Officer Brown, and seem to have a snappy taste in leather jackets.
Very eager to reveal her role.
Mine is captain queenan, I assume Double A has a role to claim as well. Mafia like to claim their fakeclaim roles to make themselves look innocent. This claim came after john was speculating that the players role might give away what kind of cop they were. If that was true, then by claiming secura would help the mafia find the normal and insane cops.

Originally Posted by
Secura
Your insistence upon this is going to make you look extremely foolish when it transpires that it isn't actually true.
Assuming I'm town. Accusing an innocent person only makes the accuser look foolish if they are also town.
All you're doing is increasing the belief that you are possibly the scum yourself. Due to this behaviour, I'm going to follow JHT's plan for the evening and investigate Sasaki. If two others will do this also, we may have a better chance of ascertaining which detective has which personality trait and see if it correlates with what JHT has said.
Now I'm mafia again. Basically the trend is that secura makes statements that have a strong subtext of "sasaki is town", but then claims out loud that my arguments against her make me scum. This post directly contradicts good strategy, which she herself posted earlier:

Originally Posted by
Secura
Are we going to use the structure that was suggested in the previous game, or are we following Sasaki's "three people investigate Secura"? I'll go along with either, but I wouldn't commit to putting all our eggs into one basket; what would we do if three people committed to investigating me overnight and I was night-killed? :/
She didn't really put much thought into this, the main point of this post was to show that she didn't mind being investigated. She later ignores the possibility of me being nightkilled and making the results useless because she knows she isn't going to nightkill me.

Originally Posted by
Secura
Considering Sasaki is the top of my suspicions just as I am his, he can post his results after I post mine (which will be about Sasaki), and then the rest of you can post yours too. If he's lying, which I'm increasingly starting to believe that he will do, then his results will not correlate with the rest of you.
Is now convinced I am mafia, out of the blue...
If I do survive the night, then my lynch won't be based upon who any of the investigations point to or any bovine excrement like that; I'm going to vote for the person I find most scummy, and that would be you, Sasaki.
And will vote me no matter what the investigations point to :/
Whereas I suspect you, yes, but it could just as easily be any of the other players.
Except not.
****
Her insisting on investigating me, the guilty claim, the next day innocent claim, and the attempt to draw conclusions from the results even though you can't legitimately do so all point to her trying to set herself up as the normal cop. I don't see any type of setup like that in Double A's post.
Summary:
The subtext of many of her posts implies that I'm town. i.e., she says things to me that you wouldn't say to someone you thought was mafia.
The initial suspicion of me was only on account of my having attacked her (which she overreacted to)
She contradicts herself
Essentially, if you try and follow her train of thought through the thread, it isn't the thinking of a townie who becomes convinced that another person is scum. It's the train of thought of a mafioso who decides that they should accuse the person who is attacking them.
Vote:Secura
Bookmarks