Indefinite Bannings

[TinCow]

Would my privacy be violated if any of you visited my private Photobucket without my knowledge iif I retrospectively gave my consent? No, it wouldn't, because the whole point of privacy is that consent is not given. Of course, if I didn't then give my consent, then that would be a violation of privacy, and AP should not have done what he did, as he didn't have prior permission. But if Secura gave her consent afterwards (I don't know if this occurred, as I haven not seen a direct statement from her, but from the VM conversation seen it would not be unreasonable to assume so temporarily), then it is not possible to use "violation of privacy" as justification for this disproportionate punishment.

Secura is not the person whose account he admitted to breaking into. That person was a Moderator, and most certainly did not consent.

So, AP has had a pre-emptive ban tio prevent him from doing actions which you're not even sure he was going to do? I thought that was the whole point of warnings.

No, AP has a ban because he admitted to breaking into 1 private Org member photobucket account (a Moderator's), implied that he had already done so to several other Org members' accounts, and implied that he was going to do so to more Org members' accounts. As for the warning, someone who's received 29 warnings/infractions in the last 12 months does not need further warnings.