StarWars: Return of the Sith [Concluded]

[Secura]

vote: Abstain.

I think Belisarius owes an explanation to your accusations, certainly, but a runaway bandwagon?

[Subotan]

Maybe not now (I personally still hold reservations). But there certainly was when the votes where piling up on you, and yet the majority of people who voted for you were derided as bandwagoners, and scummy.

Now, we are now doing exactly that to Belisaurus. Sith-hide-much?

[Renata]

vote: Abstain.

I think Belisarius owes an explanation to your accusations, certainly, but a runaway bandwagon?

There's only an hour left, so runaway or not is probably irrelevant.

Edit, apparently this is incorrect, so never mind, see below.

[Kagemusha]

Well the options are laid out there. All three will probably be lynched at some point.Take a pick. If you dont like these options then pick another like me for example as the amount of hogwash we are receiving each round makes it bit hard to remain sane in this game. How it seems. We dont get detective results worth the paper those are written into. We have no ability to network as the pro town figures cant do anything for us that has any weight on it. All we can do is play the old fashion way. Follow our instincts and vote people we think could be guilty. To me ATPG is just a potential threat = Could be handled later. Beskar is distraction =will be handled later if he cant come up with anything helpful. Belisarius, Sniff of Sasaki´s instinct = Has worked in the past.If Sasaki´s sniff will show up as hoax later.He can be dealt with.

[Renata]

Since there is time, though I doubt it will matter:

unvote, vote Psychonaut

Not much I can point my finger to, but I'm a bit suspicious of him. I'll write my reasons, such as they are, when I get time tomorrow.

[ULC]

I find this game amusing so far from an outside perspective - and I am also subscribing finally because it gets annoying to have to play catch up every 20 minutes :P

[Husar]

In memory of Husar, who got shafted out of this game, I will from now on vote however way he says without hesitation or bias.

While that seems and may actually be nice of you, I find it heavily suspicious behaviour and it absolves you of all responsibility for your votes, so don't expect any orders from this force-ghost.

[Choxorn]

Hi, guys! It's lurking me again. This thread doesn't move fast enough, does it?

[Subotan]

It moves at hyperspace

[Winston Hughes]

vote: Niklas

...is what I'd do if I hadn't read the last six pages.

[Chaotix]

I'm in catch-up mode right now. Vote: Abstain till I have read up on today's happenings.

[Chaotix]

Ok. Opinion formed. I feel bad about lynching Belisarius on the basis of him being mildly suspicious a while ago, but I'm going along with it for now because I don't want to see either Beskar or ATPG dead. If Beskar is found to be guilty, I am certain it will be brought to light by one of the Jedi Masters who can investigate besides him.

The only problem so far is that we do not know whether being guilty yields the same investigation result as being "susceptible to the Dark Side".

Unvote, Vote: Belisarius II

[Askthepizzaguy]

I know I'm a biased source, but: Susceptible won't always mean Sith, and that is a fact that I'm privy to now. When I die, that should become clearer.

So, if you find a result besides "susceptible" Then you have a serious lynch candidate.

[Centurion1]

finally finished reading........................again

vote:belisariusII

he is at least mildly scummy.

[atheotes]

Ok. Opinion formed. I feel bad about lynching Belisarius on the basis of him being mildly suspicious a while ago, but I'm going along with it for now because I don't want to see either Beskar or ATPG dead. If Beskar is found to be guilty, I am certain it will be brought to light by one of the Jedi Masters who can investigate besides him.

The only problem so far is that we do not know whether being guilty yields the same investigation result as being "susceptible to the Dark Side".

Unvote, Vote: Belisarius II

Come on... not everyone has to vote for him... what is the point of it.
I for one find you post contrived
unvote, vote: Chaotix

[Centurion1]

tally anyone?????

[Sasaki Kojiro]

tally anyone?????

I think we need one more vote on belisarius to push him ahead of you.

[naut]

Belisarius has not posted since 4/17... i dont see any point to this runaway bandwagon.

Vote: Autolycus - gut feeling...he seems to be active but just under the radar.

Hmm. I felt the same at first, but shelved the idea as IIRC English is not his native language, so it may just have been that affecting my thoughts.

Of course, it is "scummy" to be voting for Beskar when there is loads of evidence piled up against him, but just the done thing when it's done to Belisaurus when he hasn't even been given a chance to respond

This. Trying to stop a runaway bandwagon while I sleep isn't really feasible though.

Since there is time, though I doubt it will matter:

unvote, vote Psychonaut

Not much I can point my finger to, but I'm a bit suspicious of him. I'll write my reasons, such as they are, when I get time tomorrow.

I look forward to it.

Come on... not everyone has to vote for him... what is the point of it.
I for one find you post contrived
unvote, vote: Chaotix

This.

[Yaropolk]

vote: pizza

[atheotes]

I think we need one more vote on belisarius to push him ahead of you.

[Chaotix]

Come on... not everyone has to vote for him... what is the point of it.
I for one find you post contrived
unvote, vote: Chaotix

Sorry, but the post was not contrived at all.

I legitimately read through about 8 pages of argument and came to what I thought was the best option. As I said- I do not think Belisarius is the best choice for a lynch today. However, neither do I believe Beskar is guilty at all, and he currently has 3 votes on him. If there is any sort of turnaround, I want to make sure he isn't lynched.

Additionally, we really do not know what we will get for a guilty result. Will it say, "He has turned to the Dark Side", or will it say, "He is susceptible to the Dark Side"? We may never find out if the latter is true.

Rather, I find your post to be contrived, as if you were looking for a reason not to jump on the bandwagon.

FoS: atheotes.

[Belisarius II]

!!!!!!!!

What? How in God's name was I "scummy"?

I was just speaking my mind on who the murderer could be, instead of just lynching people at will.

Have I bandwagon-ed? No.

Beskar by now knows who I am at this point, I'm sure of it.

And apparently everyone here listens to Saskai whenever he shouts out to lynch someone. He's done it 3 times now in this very round!

[atheotes]

Sorry, but the post was not contrived at all.

I legitimately read through about 8 pages of argument and came to what I thought was the best option. As I said- I do not think Belisarius is the best choice for a lynch today. However, neither do I believe Beskar is guilty at all, and he currently has 3 votes on him. If there is any sort of turnaround, I want to make sure he isn't lynched.

Additionally, we really do not know what we will get for a guilty result. Will it say, "He has turned to the Dark Side", or will it say, "He is susceptible to the Dark Side"? We may never find out if the latter is true.

Rather, I find your post to be contrived, as if you were looking for a reason not to jump on the bandwagon.

FoS: atheotes.

Your attempt to save Beskar from any unexpected bandwagon and your accusation of me trying to staying away from the bandwagon would make sense only if Beskar had anywhere close to the number of votes as Belasarius

[Beskar]

!!!!!!!!

What? How in God's name was I "scummy"?

I was just speaking my mind on who the murderer could be, instead of just lynching people at will.

Have I bandwagon-ed? No.

Beskar by now knows who I am at this point, I'm sure of it.

And apparently everyone here listens to Saskai whenever he shouts out to lynch someone. He's done it 3 times now in this very round!

Actually, I don't know who you are. However, if you are trying to suggest I am in a position of trust, reveal to me privately and I will validate it or not, then I will say inthread whether or not you actually made a good claim or not.

[Chaotix]

!!!!!!!!

What? How in God's name was I "scummy"?

I was just speaking my mind on who the murderer could be, instead of just lynching people at will.

Have I bandwagon-ed? No.

Beskar by now knows who I am at this point, I'm sure of it.

And apparently everyone here listens to Saskai whenever he shouts out to lynch someone. He's done it 3 times now in this very round!

That's the way it is, unfortunately. If you reveal your role, there is a chance the masses will shift their votes onto another, better candidate, although it is not likely at this stage.

We are really only lynching you for lack of a better target right now. It was either you, ATPG, or a random lurker. In GH's words, it's that "bad mid-game lynch".

Also, @atheotes: I might feel more threatened and inclined to continue this argument if I were under more pressure myself. Unfortunately for you, I am not and I won't.

[Belisarius II]

Vote:Chaotix

EDIT: If it makes any of you feel better my rank is Padawan

That's all I feel safe giving out.

[atheotes]

Also, @atheotes: I might feel more threatened and inclined to continue this argument if I were under more pressure myself. Unfortunately for you, I am not and I won't.

unfortunately, all i have is a single vote. to be honest i was surprised that you even responded to my vote.

[atheotes]

Vote:Chaotix

EDIT: If it makes any of you feel better my rank is Padawan

That's all I feel safe giving out.

Well, that is not going to help you. you need to do more than that.

[Belisarius II]

The killer has a lightsaber and Padawans do not.

What more can you possibly need?

[Chaotix]

The killer has a lightsaber and Padawans do not.

What more can you possibly need?

A Padawan could be hiding his red lightsaber after being turned to the Dark Side by the Sith Holocron.

Or, in other words, if you were a Sith that would only be a cover role and would have no bearing on your real identity.