I am inorz!
Not this time/ GAH!!
I'm quite positive that at least one of the mafias was in the Belisarius's bandwagon.
"Well, it wasn't me!" said Askthepizzaguy, as he slinks back into the shadows.
#Winstontoostrong
#Montytoostronger
Mmmm...
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
I'm still interested in the entire pm conversation between Sasaki and Belisarius II.
I don't understand why Sasaki left out certain parts. I also fail to see why Sasaki contacted Belisarius and posted a part of the pm conversation at a time where it didn't matter much, since Belisarius' fate was pretty much sealed.
![]()
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
Catching up:
On the Chatoix/atheotes/(psychonaut) scuffle, I'm on Chaotix' side thus far.
The second part is not true. Mafia have all the incentive in the world to stay away from what they know to be a bad bandwagon if they can think of a halfway decent reason for it. I'm gathering Belisarius was in fact a bad bandwagon, though I haven't read through all the posts or the update yet. (Starting at the beginning this time, go me.) The first part, about the saving Beskar bit, might apply better -- depends if Chaotix actually counted the votes or not -- but it doesn't rise to the level of 'contrived' for me.
Anyway to sum up:
Atheotes' vote on Chaotix: meh
Chaotix' FOS on Atheotes: justified, despite the OMGUS aspect
"Blacker than a moonless night. Hotter and more bitter than Hell itself… that is coffee."
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
I had been meaning to mention: I'm convinced Sasaki is correct about mafia cover roles, and exactly for that reason: because so many players are showing up in the write-up in connection with the promotions. If that (or the "calling", even) could function as an investigation, it would break the game, recruitment or no recruitment.
Actually Beskar backed off on that and said it wasn't a conversion attempt; he'd just assumed it was.
Heck, due to my previous comment, you stand to be scapegoated no matter what. I do fully support vengeance on Beskar for that, by the way; that was completely unnecessary.I also sense a scapegoating very shortly. Just about any conversion means I am auto-lynched just to be safe. So no matter what happens, I am totally screwed.![]()
You think the mafia stayed away from the "bad" bandwagon on Belisarius? I think not. We will see in the end.
When i called his post contrived, i meant his post with the vote not his response to my accusation. The reasoning he gave for voting Belisarius made me feel that way.![]()
Happy to. Sasaki still seems scummy for baiting Pizza back on day one with questions only a half-step removed in effect from "have you stopped beating your wife". And though his report about the PMs to Belisarius had gotten around in private several hours prior to it coming up in public, I still want your questions and Niklas' answered. I have no idea why such information shouldn't have come forth in public much earlier than it did. It left Belisarius effectively no time to rebut what was in fact the meat of the accusation against him.
No, I think it's feasible that they did stay away, and Chaotix' FOS on you therefore reasonable.
I didn't read his post with the vote as contrived; I did read yours as off, though (why such a snap vote, based on a single post, that late in what had been an extremely busy day?), another reason I was on Chaotix' side as regards the FOS -- did you have any votes placed at any time earlier in the day, Atheotes?
Bookmarks