Results 1 to 30 of 1720

Thread: The United Kingdom Elections 2010

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Mr Self Important Senior Member Beskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Albion
    Posts
    15,930
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: The United Kingdom Elections 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Banquo's Ghost View Post
    One of the fascinating possibilities that is emerging along with the Liberal Democrats' poll ratings is the constitutional impact. If the Lib Dem party delivers a high twenties share of the vote, this is likely to end up with a Labour-Liberal government where the LD holds quite a lot of moral power. It would be almost impossible for such a government to resist their core demand of a change in the voting system to one of proportional representation. If that happens (and it is increasingly likely, it seems) then there will never again be a Conservative government unless there is a seismic shift in voting trends.

    Whatever one's feelings about the Tories, having an opposition with no realistic chance of government (not because of policy, but because of voting system) is a fundamentally bad thing. Yet the UK is probably weeks away from such an outcome.

    Food for thought.
    PR is a fundamentally bad system though. It is about electing parties and not people.
    (This is inregards to elections which revolve around picking a party, and if a party gets 20% of the votes, they get 20% of the Seats and the Party decides who goes into those seats.)

    There should be a bunch of democratic reforms, however, making parties stronger is a bad idea. Introducing things like "Single-Transferable Vote" (STV), "Re-Open Nominations" (RON), re-laying the boundaries based on population for Members of Parliament (removes rotten boroughs), allowing multiple candidates ascribing to the same party to stand, Regional Governance, Electable Mayors. (shouldn't be just London that elects their Mayors), the reformation of the House of Lords, perhaps even rename it to "Senate" and redefining its purpose. Could even do an electable Cabinet based on purson for the job.
    Last edited by Beskar; 04-20-2010 at 18:41.
    Days since the Apocalypse began
    "We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
    "Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."

  2. #2
    Senior Member Senior Member gaelic cowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    mayo
    Posts
    4,833

    Default Re: The United Kingdom Elections 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Beskar View Post
    PR is a fundamentally bad system though. It is about electing parties and not people.
    (This is inregards to elections which revolve around picking a party, and if a party gets 20% of the votes, they get 20% of the Seats and the Party decides who goes into those seats.)
    PR is used in the Republic and it is not about electing parties and giving them seats It does however elect people who happen to be members of parties the same would be true in UK

    Incidently Ireland is one of the longest stable democratic countries in Europe apart from UK.
    Last edited by gaelic cowboy; 04-20-2010 at 18:42.
    They slew him with poison afaid to meet him with the steel
    a gallant son of eireann was Owen Roe o'Neill.

    Internet is a bad place for info Gaelic Cowboy

  3. #3
    Mr Self Important Senior Member Beskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Albion
    Posts
    15,930
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: The United Kingdom Elections 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by gaelic cowboy View Post
    PR is used in the Republic and it is not about electing parties and giving them seats It does however elect people who happen to be members of parties the same would be true in UK
    Depends on the PR system. The one I illustrated is the most popular form which some one says "PR". What you are describing sounds like a hybrid between FPTP and PR. Need more information on it to comment, wikipedia is bare in that area.
    Days since the Apocalypse began
    "We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
    "Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."

  4. #4
    Senior Member Senior Member gaelic cowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    mayo
    Posts
    4,833

    Default Re: The United Kingdom Elections 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Beskar View Post
    Depends on the PR system. The one I illustrated is the most popular form which some one says "PR". What you are describing sounds like a hybrid between FPTP and PR. Need more information on it to comment, wikipedia is bare in that area.
    I believe Single Transferable Vote is the technical term.

    It make's for great theatre in elections too which is nice if your a political junkie
    Last edited by gaelic cowboy; 04-20-2010 at 18:45.
    They slew him with poison afaid to meet him with the steel
    a gallant son of eireann was Owen Roe o'Neill.

    Internet is a bad place for info Gaelic Cowboy

  5. #5
    Mr Self Important Senior Member Beskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Albion
    Posts
    15,930
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: The United Kingdom Elections 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by gaelic cowboy View Post
    I believe Single Transferable Vote is the technical term
    Which if you read after that comment you quoted, is what I suggested we should adopt in the UK.

    I make a distinction between PR (Party-List) and STV. Sorry if that confused you. The Party-list setup basically means you do not get to choose who gets in government, it is just some one "from that party/group".

    As quoted from the first-line of STV in wikipedia:
    The single transferable vote (STV) is a preferential voting system designed to minimize "wasted" votes, provide proportional representation, and ensure that votes are explicitly cast for individual candidates rather than party lists.
    The bold bit is the distinction.
    Last edited by Beskar; 04-20-2010 at 18:45.
    Days since the Apocalypse began
    "We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
    "Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."

  6. #6
    Senior Member Senior Member gaelic cowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    mayo
    Posts
    4,833

    Default Re: The United Kingdom Elections 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Beskar View Post
    Which if you read after that comment you quoted, is what I suggested we should adopt in the UK.

    I make a distinction between PR (Party-List) and STV. Sorry if that confused you. The Party-list setup basically means you do not get to choose who gets in government, it is just some one "from that party/group".

    As quoted from the first-line of STV in wikipedia:


    The bold bit is the distinction.
    Whoops my fault
    They slew him with poison afaid to meet him with the steel
    a gallant son of eireann was Owen Roe o'Neill.

    Internet is a bad place for info Gaelic Cowboy

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO