Results 1 to 30 of 100

Thread: Doctor Who?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Gangrenous Member Justiciar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Stockport, England
    Posts
    1,116

    Default Re: Doctor Who?

    Keates was grand, aye. Whoever cast that guy was a bloody genius.

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    I love how he visibly changed throughout the series. Purely down to the actor. They didn't so much as touch his costume in the final episode. And yet he managed to turn the concerned bureaucrat from the first episode into.. uh.. what the deuce was that? All he did was remove his glasses. And start barking like a rabid dog. I kind of guessed he personified death in some manner or other. Largely down to his constant talk of "shutting the place down". Never figured the connection would be so literal, though.

    And heaven's a cozy old pub in Manchester. True, that.
    Last edited by Justiciar; 05-22-2010 at 03:16.
    When Adam delved and Eve span, Who was then the gentleman? From the beginning all men by nature were created alike, and our bondage or servitude came in by the unjust oppression of naughty men. For if God would have had any bondsmen from the beginning, he would have appointed who should be bound, and who free. And therefore I exhort you to consider that now the time is come, appointed to us by God, in which ye may (if ye will) cast off the yoke of bondage, and recover liberty. - John Ball

  2. #2
    Ultimate Member tibilicus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,663

    Default Re: Doctor Who?

    Quote Originally Posted by Justiciar View Post
    Keates was grand, aye. Whoever cast that guy was a bloody genius.

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    I love how he visibly changed throughout the series. Purely down to the actor. They didn't so much as touch his costume in the final episode. And yet he managed to turn the concerned bureaucrat from the first episode into.. uh.. what the deuce was that? All he did was remove his glasses. And start barking like a rabid dog. I kind of guessed he personified death in some manner or other. Largely down to his constant talk of "shutting the place down". Never figured the connection would be so literal, though.

    And heaven's a cozy old pub in Manchester. True, that.
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    I believe Keates was Satan, or at least some personification of Satan. The way he tried to literally drag the three to hell was quite simplistic but really effective. Also I think further hints of him being Satan are given when Viv dies. Gene states that Viv was a "good man", suggesting he didn't deserve the fate which awaited him, as can be seen when Chris has a vision of him surrounded by flames.

    I guess Gene always knew who he was. He probably couldn't tell the others though as they wouldn't believe him and hadn't accepted their own deaths yet. Although one thing which I don't get. Gene Hunt died in what, 1952? How can he construct a world of the 70s and 80s? I guess we're now talking about matters of the divine so its plausible..
    Last edited by tibilicus; 05-22-2010 at 12:48.


    "A lamb goes to the slaughter but a man, he knows when to walk away."

  3. #3
    Voluntary Suspension Voluntary Suspension Philippus Flavius Homovallumus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    13,477

    Default Re: Doctor Who?

    Quote Originally Posted by tibilicus View Post
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    I believe Keates was Satan, or at least some personification of Satan. The way he tried to literally drag the three to hell was quite simplistic but really effective. Also I think further hints of him being Satan are given when Viv dies. Gene states that Viv was a "good man", suggesting he didn't deserve the fate which awaited him, as can be seen when Chris has a vision of him surrounded by flames.

    I guess Gene always knew who he was. He probably couldn't tell the others though as they wouldn't believe him and hadn't accepted their own deaths yet. Although one thing which I don't get. Gene Hunt died in what, 1952? How can he construct a world of the 70s and 80s? I guess we're now talking about matters of the divine so its plausible..
    Yes, Ashes to Ashes was great.

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    I don't think it was all envisaged from the beginning of Life on Mars though, I think it was only developed through this series; partly because after Sam left the series naturally gravitated towards Gene Hunt.

    I don't think Keates was actually Satan, I think he was litterally the anti-Gene, an unrepentantly bent copper who dragged other down with him. the thing about Hunt that even Sam acknowlwdges is that he wants to bang up criminals, he's focused primarily on keeping the general populace safe and putting "villains" behind bars. This is something that Gene hammers home to Sam, Gene is the ultimate uninhibited, primative, copper - he goes out and gets the bad guys, takes no [ahem] and hang the consequences.

    Keats is the complete oppersite, obsessed with protocol, and "results" in terms of stats and form filling- there's a quite serious point about modern policing in there. I say he is the anti-Gene, because where Gene has chosen to stay behind in purgatory to hasten other coppers along, Keats has fairly obviously been sent by someone (the Devil) to drag the same people to Hell.

    More on Gene: He said that he had "forgotten", which is also what the Con-man claiming to be Sam said to Alex earlier. This implies that Gene is not a "chosen" agent so much as someone who has chosen not to "cross over", note his pointed refusal to enter the Pub with the others.

    On the world: I think it moves foward with the people in it, and it isn't actually centred on Gene; Keats lied about that. It may be that everyone there is a lost soul in some sense or another. Remember the Italian guy who inexplicable dissapears, "back to Italy" because someone else has "died". What about the prisoner who is obsessed with killing coppers, and then dies having become "a legend". I think the policeman part is just the only part we actually see; I don't think it's just Gene's fantasy.

    So Gene has been ther 30 years, Sam was there 7, Ray and Chris probably at least ten, Shaz probably less judging by the relatively recent context of her death. The real question is how come there aren't a lot more coppers getting the "culture shcok" thing when they arrive?

    Is it just a certain hyper-rational mind, or is it a privilage reserved for DCI's
    "If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."

    [IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]

  4. #4
    Ultimate Member tibilicus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,663

    Default Re: Doctor Who?

    Quote Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla View Post


    Is it just a certain hyper-rational mind, or is it a privilage reserved for DCI's
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    I'm kind of moving towards the theory that those who remember their lives before their "deaths" do so because they're not actually dead yet. Sam actually went back to the "real world" (supposedly) and Drake was in a coma, briefly waking before her actual death. Perhaps then they're given a chance to get back to their world if they're not actually dead yet. I don't really know though, it seems like a bit of a plot hole and that's the only thing I can think of to explain it, be it inadequately.

    I can't really think of what other reason there could be seeming Drake and Sam weren't quite dead whilst Shaz, Chris and Ray were.
    Last edited by tibilicus; 05-23-2010 at 02:13.


    "A lamb goes to the slaughter but a man, he knows when to walk away."

  5. #5
    Voluntary Suspension Voluntary Suspension Philippus Flavius Homovallumus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    13,477

    Default Re: Doctor Who?

    Quote Originally Posted by tibilicus View Post
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    I'm kind of moving towards the theory that those who remember their lives before their "deaths" do so because they're not actually dead yet. Sam actually went back to the "real world" (supposedly) and Drake was in a coma, briefly waking before her actual death. Perhaps then they're given a chance to get back to their world if they're not actually dead yet. I don't really know though, it seems like a bit of a plot hole and that's the only thing I can think of to explain it, be it inadequately.

    I can't really think of what other reason there could be seeming Drake and Sam weren't quite dead whilst Shaz, Chris and Ray were.
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    actually, that makes perfect sense. If you think about it, being in a between-life-and-death state would mean you were existing in two worlds at once, and hence the disslocation. Drake was also immidiately translated to "Gene's" world when she was shot, but didn't die until after the bullet was removed.
    "If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."

    [IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO