Daggers in the Night [Concluded]

[Niklas]

I must say that the case against atheotes is very interesting to my mind, even at a level beyond the game. It's an immediate application of ATPG's "Mafia ESP" theory (which was definitely true for Subotan in Sigurd's game), and I'd very much like to see if it holds water beyond that game.

vote: atheotes

[TinCow]

I must say that the case against atheotes is very interesting to my mind, even at a level beyond the game. It's an immediate application of ATPG's "Mafia ESP" theory (which was definitely true for Subotan in Sigurd's game), and I'd very much like to see if it holds water beyond that game.

Where was this case posted? I seem to have missed it.

[TheFlax]

Where was this case posted? I seem to have missed it.

Here, though its rather brief and incomplete, I did not have a chance to talk alot with Renata.

[Romanic]

You're picking on that post but not Scienter's post above with not vote and only a FOS? Why?

Why are you asking me this? Am I expected to do it every time if I do it once?

I'm not questioning his motive, I just wanted to know why he thought Methos' post was scummier than Scienter's. Its not because Romanic is dead that he's suddenly infallible.

Who said I was infallible? It was a probe to get Methos to talk/vote, like a lot of people do. I don't get your reaction here.

[TheFlax]

Why are you asking me this? Am I expected to do it every time if I do it once?

I'm asking because I wanted to know why specifically that post. I think it was valid to point it out and it actually indirectly led me to Scienter's post, who might I add has still not voted. Also, I'm not expecting something, I'm genuinely curious. Maybe my question sounded aggressive, but there's no point in me doing that, since you're already dead. Basicaly, I'm not accusing you of anything, I just wanted to know more, specifically why you picked that particular post.

Who said I was infallible? It was a probe to get Methos to talk/vote, like a lot of people do. I don't get your reaction here.

That was a reply to Sasaki asking me why I was questioning someone who is already dead, implying it was bad and scummy. I happen to think everyone and everything should at least be somewhat questioned. Funny how an innocent question can lead to all of this...

[Scienter]

I'm asking because I wanted to know why specifically that post. I think it was valid to point it out and it actually indirectly led me to Scienter's post, who might I add has still not voted.

My FOS post was intended to foster some discussion before everyone started voting. I tend to agree with the others that spl1t is probably going to get WOG'd. Vote:atheotes.

I wanted to see Kagemusha and TinCow defend themselves a little before I voted. While I agree that TC has been distracted with work-related IRL stuff and crack Civ IV, but I still suspect that he'd be able to pm around discretely enough that I wouldn't notice if he was scheming.

[Renata]

I must say that the case against atheotes is very interesting to my mind, even at a level beyond the game. It's an immediate application of ATPG's "Mafia ESP" theory (which was definitely true for Subotan in Sigurd's game), and I'd very much like to see if it holds water beyond that game.

vote: atheotes

Your own votes, Niklas, are pretty much the ANTI mafia ESP thing, which is interesting given that you're clearly aware of it (everyone on your list of end-of-day votes is still alive).

Re: split, from talking to Romanic it appears that he won't meet the WOG requirement until approximately tomorrow, so full disclosure: if you want him to no longer be plaguing our hind-brains with "why did he show up only when he was on the verge of WOG, only to disappear again?), you will probably have to vote for him.

About Atheotes, though, the vote pattern is really far too short for mafia ESP to apply. What I do see there is:
-- four votes in six days (two non-votes).
-- three of four end-of-day votes on a pre-existing and ultimately successful bandwagon (no making waves here)
-- very little in the way of commentary in general ... except he wrote a good long post when I accused him the other day

It's a very scummy pattern, and he deserves to be lynched for it.

So does split. But I prefer Atheotes first because of the last point that's been mentioned, his last-hour vote on white_eyes, moving WE from four votes to five against a whole passel of people with two votes. (One of whom is now dead -- Romanic.) If Atheotes turns up mafia, that group of people should prove good hunting.

[Beskar]

i would llke to point out TinCow's comment:
"atheotes hasn't posted in 2 days, but that's a lot better than 5."

atheotes stopped posting exactly after Renata and others made a case against him. Just before this, he was out there accusing people, including myself.

aka, he is scum.

It is the typical atheotes mafia-manoeuvre.

[Renata]

Oh, forgot -- I've decided not to make public my choices as Naib, though Diana knows.

[The Stranger]

you just forgot? wth! the town has the right to know. at first you would make the public if you would not be reelected. Now you have not been reelected and you break your promise. jesus, its the same with all politicians. Maybe Diana is your mafia pall. I DEMAND that ATLEAST THREE MORE PERSONS are NOTIFIED of your DECISIONS as a NAIB!!! i think that is a reasonable demand.

and fos at you, for this very scummy forgetting and breaking of promises.

[Renata]

You OK, Stranger? That was little overwrought.

[The Stranger]

i dont think so. cough up those bloody night orders!