Monarchs, and indeed nobility, are people too.Originally Posted by HoreTore
Are you the same Andres that threw a hissyfit over people applauding the death of Afghani insurgents?
[/irritating pest]
Monarchs, and indeed nobility, are people too.Originally Posted by HoreTore
Are you the same Andres that threw a hissyfit over people applauding the death of Afghani insurgents?
[/irritating pest]
Last edited by Louis VI the Fat; 05-31-2010 at 16:54.
How about changing the inheritance laws so his children gain neither his title nor his wealth. Thus no need to kill him....
#Hillary4prism
BD:TW
Some piously affirm: "The truth is such and such. I know! I see!"
And hold that everything depends upon having the “right” religion.
But when one really knows, one has no need of religion. - Mahavyuha Sutra
Freedom necessarily involves risk. - Alan Watts
I fully agree HoreTore, this whole scenario is disgusting.
I mean, why on earth is a monarch competing in the market-place? How improper, as if our fine blue-blooded aristocrats should be working for a living like some common peasant. How can we expect them to carry an air of nobility when they have to earn a living like some rags to riches factory owner?
At the end of the day politics is just trash compared to the Gospel.
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
The only good Republican is a dead Republican!
Wait, that sounds a bit intollerant and anti-Hummanist, hmmmm.....
Seriously though, Royal families are cheap, much cheaper than any other head of state.
On the issue of stocks though, they should be declared after a six month clearing period to allow His Majesty's broker to tidy things up and prevent embarressment.
On the issue of the shore: In Britain the first hundred yards or so are owned by the Queen, and thus can only be closed by her or her government. I assume a similar constitutional situation exists in Norway.
"If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."
[IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
You'll never get rid of them anymore, horeTore.
The problem with monarchs is that so many people get under the spell of their power. Wealth and power are magnets, they attract. By supporting the monarchy, a bit of its glamour and magnificence shines on the supporter. Like moths hovering around a lamp. Regardless of whether it concerns people in actual power, who lose their republican values the second they get their chance to get close to a monarch, or the masses. Supporting the monarchy makes the lower and middle class supporter believe he is really one class higher than he actually is.
They complain about the politician earning 100k, but willingly grant the monarch his millions. And his beaches. and all other priviliges. All the royal has got to do in return is to marry, to have babies, and to die, so as to fill the tabloids for the reader to fawn over.
Still, why people would willingly be subjects of a monarch will always remain beyond me.
I suppose you people are simply not ready yet for the status of free and equal citizen, the sole master of his own destiny.
Que veut cette horde d'esclaves, de traîtres, de rois conjurés?
Pour qui ces ignobles entraves, ces fers dès longtemps préparés?
Français, pour nous, ah! Quel outrage, quels transports il doit exciter!
C'est nous qu'on ose méditer, de rendre à l'antique esclavage!
Aux armes, citoyens! Formez vos bataillons! Marchons, marchons!!![]()
![]()
(O arme, Bordèu!)
Less messy solution.
Last edited by Hosakawa Tito; 05-31-2010 at 16:49.
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." *Jim Elliot*
Last edited by Andres; 05-31-2010 at 16:51.
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
Bookmarks