Beefdom will rise once more [Concluded]

[Splitpersonality]

(OOC: Come on now... Your big fun RP post is stacking 7 votes on a person who was just attacked by the mafia the previous night and you expect this to slide just because its "fun RP"?)

You can only ask so much of a man, you can ask him to play right, or to play as roleplaying.

If they are fundamentally juxtaposed with each other what more can you expect?


I really wish I had a support vote, because I, for one, see ATPG as a great asset if he's not role playing.

[TheFlax]

You can only ask so much of a man, you can ask him to play right, or to play as roleplaying.

If they are fundamentally juxtaposed with each other what more can you expect?


I really wish I had a support vote, because I, for one, see ATPG as a great asset if he's not role playing.

(Right, roleplaying is putting single handedly in the lead one the players the least likely to be mafia, just because they have called you greedy. You know, this wouldn't have happened if ATPG's vote was worth 1 vote, but 7 votes on a person is like being a one man bandwagon. I'm very sorry you associate roleplayer with making poor decisions or fooling around, because its not necessarily that.)

[Splitpersonality]

(Right, roleplaying is putting single handedly in the lead one the players the least likely to be mafia, just because they have called you greedy. You know, this wouldn't have happened if ATPG's vote was worth 1 vote, but 7 votes on a person is like being a one man bandwagon. I'm very sorry you associate roleplayer with making poor decisions or fooling around, because its not necessarily that.)

Absolutely no offense is meant by this, but don't tell me what I associate. I understand that not all roleplayers, or people who roleplay even infrequently do these things.

I am simply saying, that this seems to be ATPG's personal style, and I don't think we should ask him to change who he is because we don't like it.

[TheFlax]

Absolutely no offense is meant by this, but don't tell me what I associate. I understand that not all roleplayers, or people who roleplay even infrequently do these things.

I am simply saying, that this seems to be ATPG's personal style, and I don't think we should ask him to change who he is because we don't like it.

(Alright, I assumed too much in reading your post, sorry. ATPG can play as he wants, his was funny in his usual fashion, I just don't see how everyone else reaction was unjustified, to me it is very justified. Especially since I never asked him to change his style or to roleplay.)

[Romanic]

*Lord Sausage bangs his fist on the table hard*

Enough with the nonsense! Our consuls made a good job last night protecting twelve (yes twelve!) of us with a good strategy, and now I am hearing talks about lynching one of them? The source of these rebellious thoughts must be the Beefdom itself. Let's see who started all this...

*Lord Sausage looks at some papers in front of him*

Ah... Ah-ha!!! I've found the enemy! But, it's my good friend Stefan Vi Brittania :(

This received much criticism; most notable was Duke of Puce (autolycus) and Stefan vi Britannia (Beskar), the Khan promised to change his ways, and adopted a strategy given to him by Stefan for the consuls to protect the council members. However, during this strategy, he purposefully did not protect Duke of Puce and Stefan, who ended up getting attacked. Stefan only survived because of the Maheerni acting out of Pizza’s orders. It doesn’t take much to realise Khaan Pizza did this deliberately.

How sure are you about this Stefan? I also spoke about strategic protection with Khaan Pizzaguy, and he preferred to keep his moves secret so that the Beefdom couldn't get any idea. To be blunt, I am having a hard time believing your claims. Pizzaguy would not reveal these orders to you when he knows your wife like to listen at the doors. If you died, she would have told every one of us about this and he could have been lynched for it.

It's a mistake to lynch our Consul at this time. I will register my protest like this:

vote: Beskar

[Askthepizzaguy]

@Beefy-

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

RP information- The khan's self-vote indicates a seppuku. Honorable suicide before being hanged by these lowly peasants!

[Death is yonder]

Lord Dimitri is most displeased that all this action has occurred when he was asleep.

I understand that with the two Consul's voting for the Khaan, my vote has now become worthless. Nevertheless, I shall,

Unvote: Chaotix
Vote: ATPG

I will not stand to have a last minute vote change followed by a night of chaos. I am indeed sad that the Khaan has drastically reversed his mentality, and I am thoroughly confused as to the motives of Lord Sausage of voting Stefani. You may protest the reasons for voting the Khaan, but instead you vote Stefani who is practically confirmed innocent? You would rather sacrifice a confirmed innocent on the very basis that the Khaan has been attempting to do good work?

Earlier I have already stated that while I admire the Khaan's efforts, like the Chaos Knight, night actions do not prove much, other than being attacked by the renegades and surviving. The flaw in your reasoning is evident Lord Sausage. Have you just overplayed your hand and revealed your allegiance to the empire of Beefdom?

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Deepest apologies if this was truly just trying to have fun, but there's always other ways instead of trying to kill off the the night kill survivor with a massive voting block due to your Consul power

[Askthepizzaguy]

OOC: Was an In-Character, Roleplay-based, JOKE VOTE. I even told Beskar I'd reverse it if he just played along. I'd rather stay in-character than reverse my vote.

IC: You vile dogs have no honor anyway.

[Romanic]

I will not stand to have a last minute vote change followed by a night of chaos. I am indeed sad that the Khaan has drastically reversed his mentality, and I am thoroughly confused as to the motives of Lord Sausage of voting Stefani. You may protest the reasons for voting the Khaan, but instead you vote Stefani who is practically confirmed innocent? You would rather sacrifice a confirmed innocent on the very basis that the Khaan has been attempting to do good work?

Lord Dimitri, be careful with your assumptions, the Beefdom is cunning and will defeat us if we don't pay attention. Stefan being attacked does not make him innocent, it could be a fake attack by the Beefdom, destined to make us believe that Stefan is on our side. This scenario makes even more sense if his Beefdom associate is Sergeant pevergreen or Lord Warman because with 0 army that's all they can do, a failing attack.

I am not saying Stefan vi Britannia is a Beefdom member, what I'm saying is:

Be alert, treachery is everywhere!

[pevergreen]

pevergreen stands up

THIS IS WHAT YOU ALL SOUND LIKE


HURRRRRR