Rangoon Kaboom

**Cute Wolf** · 06-06-2010, 17:29

Originally Posted by aimlesswanderer

If only this became more of an issue when dubya was still in charge. If you told them there was lots oil and other resources there, hello regime change! The area is much less of a mess too.

actually that dubya give some nukes to his "allied" nations... really

**Seamus Fermanagh** · 06-06-2010, 20:22

Originally Posted by Cute Wolf

actually that dubya give some nukes to his "allied" nations... really

Source?

**Furunculus** · 06-06-2010, 22:43

Originally Posted by Cute Wolf

actually that dubya give some nukes to his "allied" nations... really

really..............?

**Cute Wolf** · 06-06-2010, 22:47

it was common knowledge that he helped us in constructing that nuclear reactor researches...... (for unknown reasons, USA helped us in planning nuclear reactor, but the very same thing with Iran got him furious, got the disproportionality?)

**Furunculus** · 06-06-2010, 23:07

there is a difference between a nuclear reactor and active collusion to assist a nuclear weapons program in Indonesia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_Indonesia

**Cute Wolf** · 06-06-2010, 23:26

but why they forbid the Iranians for getting the very same thing? the Iranians only build nuclear reactors... (although I didn't like Ahmedinejad's viewpoint either, but why not got some peaceful nuclear use?)

I'm sure Burmese also want some peaceful use too....

**Furunculus** · 06-06-2010, 23:29

lets go back to first principles; why would the fact that iran has been refused nuclear technology indicate that the US is giving nuclear weapons technology?

**Kadagar_AV** · 06-07-2010, 01:28

Originally Posted by KukriKhan

We should start a pool: In what year will 50% of nations possess nukes.

I lay 20 bucks on 2014.

-edit-
I'll instead be more cognizant of history and pick August 6th, 2015. A full 70 years after Hiroshima.

And I suppose we should pat ourselves on the back, that we managed to delay that awful day for 2 generations.

I do assume you are joking?

~195 nations in the world.
7 of them have nukes as we know, 8 with Israel (as we all know have nukes regardless; but as they are Israel they don't need to be open about it because they are, well, Israel).

0-4 nations are developing nukes... 1 most def if you trust Fox News, but then I assume the common reader of this thread is not retarded.

Lets bump it up to a possible 12 with unknown factors? Just to be lenient.

Still have quite some to go.

As a side note: is it not fun how the only country to use such as despicable weapon somehow think they are fit to judge who should have nukes and not?