It's a pet peeve of mine. In any case I was looking at the wrong section with that previous post. Here is the proper section about sentencing guidelines, which gives the minimum at 5 years plus a fine. This is the bit that let the judge do what they wanted:
The point being that the law was followed in this case, because the law specifically allows a judge to go below the minimum term if they think it appropriate.The court shall impose an appropriate custodial sentence (or order for detention) for a term of at least the required minimum term (with or without a fine) unless the court is of the opinion that there are exceptional circumstances relating to the offence or to the offender which justify its not doing so.
Bookmarks