A Bridge Zhou Far - Three Stars Rising | NORTH BANK [Concluded]

[wideyedwanderer]

I've been noticing that that's just landlubber's personality to state the obvious and repeat what someone else said. I thought he was suspicious in other games based on things he said, but so far he's always been clean. Not ruling him out of being mafia, but I'm just not buying it unless there is other evidence.

I don't know about AVSM...I don't like the idea of being suspicious of someone just because they aren't around. Is there more to go on?

Nictel, on the other hand, I know he's been on the forums since he's been active in other threads, yet he has been rather quiet since we've been on this side of the bank, no? That is cause for suspicion.

As for my second suspect...I'd have to go with one of the leaders, either Autolycus or Askthepizzaguy, not because I don't trust the leadership, but because as split said, being the guy on top is automatically a reason to be suspicious. I'll go with Askthepizzaguy because he has entered the game relatively recently, we know less about him (has he been scanned?), and he's been very vocal since we've been separated. Autolycus has been around since the beginning, so I'd assume that GH and his leaders have good reason to believe he's clean.

[Romanic]

As for my second suspect...I'd have to go with one of the leaders, either Autolycus or Askthepizzaguy, not because I don't trust the leadership, but because as split said, being the guy on top is automatically a reason to be suspicious. [...]

Where did you get that ATPG is one of our leaders? He sure talks a lot, but he's not an officer, nor was Thermal, the player ATPG replaced.

[wideyedwanderer]

Not officially one of our leaders, but he has taken sort of a leadership role since we've been on this side of the river.

[Askthepizzaguy]

I could always go back to not talking, but there was basically zero discussion then. I've been trying to light a fire under people's hind ends and get them to.... utter.... thoughts.

Thoughts are good.

[wideyedwanderer]

Not that I think there's anything wrong with talking. This has been the most discussion we've had since being on this side of the bank, and it's a lot more interesting (and productive) than not doing anything.

[Askthepizzaguy]

I'm going to be pretty busy today with critical RL stuff, so at this point I can't afford to wait any longer. Auto, do we lynch a suspect or an inactive?

I've given landlubber a chance to accuse, he has not, and he makes my "imperialist scum"dar twitch. Alternatively, we can go with AVSM the non-suspect just to spare all the active comrades.

[landlubber]

I've given landlubber a chance to accuse, he has not, and he makes my "imperialist scum"dar twitch. Alternatively, we can go with AVSM the non-suspect just to spare all the active comrades.

If I had to accuse someone, it would be Vote:AVSM. I think that if we lynch an active player, especially one that is a main contributor to this thread, then we've killed some discussion. Let's not do that.

[DELETE_THIS]

Forgot to subscribe.

Also I wonder what we should do now, I agree that I doubt ALL of us are innocent good communists. The chance is there but I think it is indeed small. The problems are all rather obvious.

Unless there are scanners among us we could either start lynching someone each day, hoping to find traitors among us or lynch none and hope that the South has been more successful in finding traitors.
There is still the issue of attacking the fort, I would hate for us to get stabbed in the back.

Even though I haven't been very active myself, AVSM has managed to be even less active than me, perhaps a feat in it self. Now leadership is always a suspicious role, too often have supposed leaders send us to our graves. Look where it has gotten us now; separated and confused.