But as yet as there is no current outstanding sentence they don't.
If the USA were to sentence him in absentia then they would have to extradite him.
![]()
But as yet as there is no current outstanding sentence they don't.
If the USA were to sentence him in absentia then they would have to extradite him.
![]()
An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
"If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill
My guess would be: powerful friends.
![]()
An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
"If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill
Well, article 7 of the treaty is vague enough to allow Switzerland to refuse the extradition in case of a sentencing "in absentia", if the US doesn't give enough "assurances" of the persons' rights of defense. So, not sentencing him in absentia, probably isn't a bad move.
Then again, the treaty is from 1990 and Polanski ran away in 1978, so it's not likely that said article of said treaty was the rationale behind not sentencing him in absentia.
However, the smart thing to do now, is not sentencing him in absentia, because then Switzerland has no legal grounds whatsoever to refuse the extradition.
Last edited by Andres; 07-13-2010 at 15:47.
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
He has been charged and (according to Wiki), the charges are still pending.
According to the treaty, the countries agreed to extradite persons who have been charged with an "extraditable offense" (=definition is in the next article; crimes that are punishable with jail time exceeding one year; I assume rape is such a crime). Being charged with is enough; it's not necessary to be sentenced already.
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
Bookmarks