The Trouble in Waiting [Concluded]

**woad&fangs** · 07-19-2010, 04:42

Round 1: "Random vote: Renata"

This cannot be defined as a suspicious vote by anyone except Renata. Therefore, it is the safest move. It also joined no bandwagon, therefore it attracts no attention.
Yes, a random vote on day one is definitive evidence that I am scummy :eyeroll:

Split votes for you.

He's dead.
Splits vote was ordained by the Random one. This "evidence" is poppycock.

Round 2: Vote: Beskar "admit your guilt!"

"Admit your guilt?" Seems fake to me. Doesn't match the tone of your other posts.
How does the fact it doesn't match my tone in the rest of the thread make me scummy?
ArpeggiateTHIS votes for you.

He's dead.
Yes, you caught me red handed. I brainwashed the town into lynching a guy who voted for me.
Perhaps I fingered your scum buddy, Apreg....

Yeah except you didn't, because they are both dead.
Yep, I was wrong. It happens.

I'm not lurking post.
Not sure which one you are referring to here.

Unvote, vote: Arpeg

Following my bandwagon, which is convenient for you because it eliminates the guy that just voted for you.
Yes, voting for the guy I thought was suspicious was following your bandwagon. Remember that I thought Beskar and him were the scum. Arp was the more popular choice that day.

Next round: Vote Beskar

After he votes to kill himself, you top it on the excuse that he voted for himself, therefore he must be guilty. If so, he would have unvoted himself.

My reasons for voting him are known. Nothing to see here.

Next round: Dead proven innocent mentions my name as a suspect.

Woad: Care to elaborate?

As if you cared what his reasons were.
It is preferential to barreling in without a clue on an important round.

I vote for Renata.

Following up on my suspicions from yesterday, based on who was killed.
So you claim

I'll give you a hint: mafia typically toss their votes on a lot of different people. The logical follow-up on Renata is not usually indicative of mafia.
However, you know that so it turns into one giant WIFOM.

* A dead innocent finds me suspect. Which is a pretty decent reason to follow up on his suspicion
* I'm voting for someone else... now, I have made someone else find me more suspicious. Renata is more likely to vote for me than not.Irrelavant seeing as I am town
* You don't have to explain your vote. ~Obviously I did.
* The timing is perfect. I die, you win. ~Reverse the I and the you

TL;DR~ VOTE PIZZA

**Beskar** · 07-19-2010, 05:14

The Mafia voted for me.

Also, ATPG would have killed Diana himself, in order to fool people which he did by trying to blame me and Renata.

**Askthepizzaguy** · 07-19-2010, 05:22

Originally Posted by Beskar

The Mafia voted for me.

Also, ATPG would have killed Diana himself, in order to fool people which he did by trying to blame me and Renata. Lynch him.

I'll accept your apology after the game. You're not reading any of this, are you?

**Beskar** · 07-19-2010, 05:27

Let's put Pizza and Woad into a room, then bomb it, so they both die.

Okay seriously, I am going to take the gamble, kill Woad, he is most likely the mafia out of the two of them.

**Askthepizzaguy** · 07-19-2010, 06:35

Originally Posted by Beskar

Okay seriously, I am going to take the gamble, kill Woad, he is most likely the mafia out of the two of them.

@woad: I have a dead guy too. My dead guy can beat up your dead guy.

Oooh I just got a neat idea for a game.

**woad&fangs** · 07-19-2010, 06:59

Nuh uh! Zombie Pinman totally is better than zombie Beskar! I'm going to sleep now. Hopefully the rest of the living players make the right choice.

**God Emperor** · 07-19-2010, 12:10

Finally done with the wall of text
Pizza has one point that seems to be above all other: If he dies, and if he is a town, we lose.
Woad&fangs
If there still occurs two killings the following night, then targeting pizza for the next round seems fair. If only a single kill occurs the next night, the chances that pizza is not a mafia, should be pretty high, and good enough to him go off the hook
Anything wrong with this 'theory'?

**Askthepizzaguy** · 07-19-2010, 05:21

Originally Posted by woad&fangs

Yes, a random vote on day one is definitive evidence that I am scummy :eyeroll:

THE EYEROLL!!! THERE IT IS!!!

Oh how I've missed you mister eyeroll smiley.... I haven't seen you since every mafia I've ever accused.

Hold on, let me go grab it from Star Wars. Where's Subotan's quote?

"And apparently, ATPG is always right. "- Subotan.

Why is it you mafia always roll your eyes at me? Can you tell me this, because I really want to know. Townies don't roll their eyes at me because when I am wrong, they generally just state it. One or two argue with me defiantly, and some of them kick my butt at arguing because they aren't actually scum. Some knock the wind out of my sails with a single line that disproves everything I just said.

But no, the mafia struggle a bit, and when they get frustrated, it's EYEROLL TIME.

Splits vote was ordained by the Random one. This "evidence" is poppycock.

The point is, he's dead now. I would guess that his voting for you becomes uncomfortable, and so it's best to whack him because it's suspicious to OMGUS and then wagon so early in the game. So, murdering is the simplest choice.

How does the fact it doesn't match my tone in the rest of the thread make me scummy?

Uneven tone is what points out people who are full of poopy. Like you!

Yes, you caught me red handed. I brainwashed the town into lynching a guy who voted for me.

Hi mister strawman!

I was arguing that you were only too happy to get rid of someone who voted for you, so wagoning him was opportunistic.

But no, you'd rather argue against a strawman. Have fun!

Yep, I was wrong. It happens.

You know who is wrong more often than townies? Mafia.

You know who is wrong on the critical rounds of the game, the final rounds? The Mafia have to be wrong on the final round of the game or else they lose.

Who wants to make the wrong vote, and waits for someone else to prompt said vote so they can deny responsibility? Mafia.

Hey, I might be voting for you, but the corpse told me to. Don't blame me!

Yes, voting for the guy I thought was suspicious was following your bandwagon. Remember that I thought Beskar and him were the scum. Arp was the more popular choice that day.

Next round: Vote Beskar

After he votes to kill himself, you top it on the excuse that he voted for himself, therefore he must be guilty. If so, he would have unvoted himself.

My reasons for voting him are known. Nothing to see here.

Your reasons are bogus. You capped him and used his self-vote as the excuse.

It is preferential to barreling in without a clue on an important round.

Why aren't you looking for your own clues, oh woadiest of woads?

Which is a pretty decent reason to follow up on his suspicion

No, it is not. But it does sound like a reason, and a reason is something you desperately need, since you don't have reasons of your own.

Irrelavant seeing as I am town

Then why are you acting like a lying murderous scumbag strawman-using poopypants?

Obviously I did.

Vote: Pizza, followed by blank, isn't a reason.

Reverse the I and the you

"No you!"

Excellent defense, about as excellent as your nonexistent case on me.

TL;DR~ VOTE PIZZA

Yes, look, there's lots of words.

Words hurt brain.

People no like words.

My, pizza is talking a lot. People don't always like that.

Why do in text base game people use words?

Translation: Don't listen to either of us, fellow players, because I'm losing badly! Just vote for Pizza, please? He's annoying with his words and stuff.