Wikileaks reveals identity of Afgan informants

[Skullheadhq]

I know what's in it. You thought it was a good idea to enpower the government with such means if it would halt the rise of the right.

I have NEVER said anything like that.

Christians and leftists don't respect privacy capice

And Wilders and Teeven do respect freedom or privacy? If it was up to them Netherlands would be a police state already. They would curtail Wikileaks as eagerly as Hirsch Stalin.

[Fragony]

I have NEVER said anything like that.


And Wilders and Teeven do respect freedom or privacy? If it was up to them Netherlands would be a police state already. They would curtail Wikileaks as eagerly as Hirsch Stalin.

I prefer to call him Hirschbollah. Again it's what you wanted, the comfortable bliss that is an ideal society isn't free of charge. Creepy no?

[Skullheadhq]

Again it's what you wanted.

No, where did I ever say I wanted this? Hirsch Stalin or Hirschbollah wanted to outlaw games a few weeks ago, this man is crazy! I still hope for a cabinet without the CDA and Fred Teeven.

Creepy no?

Creepy isn't a strong enough word to describe this law.

[Fragony]

No, where did I ever say I wanted this?

Your were glad Beatricks put her foot down to stop Wilders, making it possible for her to overrule parlement as she pleases. You aplauded that so don't complain when they construct ways to get to you as well.

[Skullheadhq]

Your were glad Beatricks put her foot down to stop Wilders, making it possible for her to overrule parlement as she pleases. You aplauded that so don't complain when they construct ways to get to you as well.

The queen appoints 'informanten' since she's on the throne, why bother now. If there is someone with experience, it's her. Parliament doesn't appoint them, so there's no overruling, and Wilders would destroy freedom and privacy anyway, constructing the Netherlands to his own Utopia, Israel.

And no, the queen doing her job and a nutcase of a Hirsch Stalin trying to outlaw games and freedom of press and freedom of information is not the same.

[Fragony]

And no, the queen doing her job and a nutcase of a Hirsch Stalin trying to outlaw games and freedom of press and freedom of information is not the same.

Yes it is, the OM is to judge what is allowed content or not with this law, not the judge. In the purple setup you wanted her travesty would decide, not the parlement. We have a trias politica for a reason, to keep meddling of interests to a minimum.

[Skullheadhq]

Yes it is, the OM is to judge what is allowed content or not with this law, not the judge. In the purple setup you wanted her travesty would decide, not the parlement. We have a trias politica for a reason, to keep meddling of interests to a minimum.

No Montesquieu in the Netherlands, if you want him you can always go to Belgium. The OM is part of the state, the OM can censor the internet so the state can censor the internet if they deem it 'unfit' without the possibility of a Parliamentary intervention. It's that simple. Luckily I know how to work with proxies, but people who want information but can't most possibly don't know how to work with proxies.