Wikileaks reveals identity of Afgan informants

[Fragony]

I'm shocked and stunned by this amazing story!

Rich kids are from a different planet, these people are now in mortal danger, what leftist rich kids think is just will never be more than a hobby. Why so egocentrical, as if this is just merely a difference of armchair-cosmopolitist opinion, these people are dead and so are their family.

[HoreTore]

these people are dead and so are their family.

Yes, because it's completely impossible to ship them over here...........

[Fragony]

Yes, because it's completely impossible to ship them over here...........

I guess that makes sense in the sphere of moral superiority, thank you for taking the time whining for all our sins.

[Skullheadhq]

Rich kids are from a different planet, these people are now in mortal danger, what leftist rich kids think is just will never be more than a hobby. Why so egocentrical, as if this is just merely a difference of armchair-cosmopolitist opinion, these people are dead and so are their family.

I was refering to 250 kilo John who eats humans, and I'm not a rich kid *sips his champaign*

[Myrddraal]

Why so egocentrical, as if this is just merely a difference of armchair-cosmopolitist opinion, these people are dead and so are their family.

I agree. I'm stunned that some members here are so callous. You are condoning the deaths of people here, with a cheery grin and a 'I just dare you to contradict me' attitude.

No freedom is limitless. Consider that philosophical point for more than five minutes and you'll realise that you're talking absolute when you talk about absolute freedom.

[Skullheadhq]

You are condoning the deaths of people here.

I don't, all those who kill people should be punished severely, you will never see me advocating or condoning murder or any other crime that hurts others. This goes for the Taliban and the NATO forces who, according to "the Death sentence", don't mind innocents dying at their hands.

And Fragony, you're constantly hammering about the safety of the informants, but when HoreTore mentions the possibility of shipping them over, you talk about 'our sins' as if you already left them there.

[Fragony]

And Fragony, you're constantly hammering about the safety of the informants, but when HoreTore mentions the possibility of shipping them over, you talk about 'our sins' as if you already left them there.

Why do you assume they want to be here? Maybe they want to live where they do? Maybe they have a good reason to not like the fundi's? What are the odds of that, someone who doesn't want a flatscreen, call out the hounds a sheep is confused.

[HoreTore]

I agree. I'm stunned that some members here are so callous. You are condoning the deaths of people here, with a cheery grin and a 'I just dare you to contradict me' attitude.

Civilians are killed or wounded by NATO forces all the time; that's okay, but I'm supposed to be all tear-up because 20-something informants are in danger of dying(unless they're already dead or they escape)? Puh-lease.

And might I note that people are also calling for the murder of the people working for WikiLeaks.... But that's okay too, right?

I guess that makes sense in the sphere of moral superiority, thank you for taking the time whining for all our sins.

People who work for one side in a conflict all know that it's very likely that they will have to flee at some point. Gawd, that's a basic fact of life, and something they must have considered when they chose to help NATO. As they still wanted to help NATO, it must mean that they would not object to relocating to another country.

[seireikhaan]

Civilians are killed or wounded by NATO forces all the time; that's okay, but I'm supposed to be all tear-up because 20-something informants are in danger of dying(unless they're already dead or they escape)? Puh-lease.

And might I note that people are also calling for the murder of the people working for WikiLeaks.... But that's okay too, right?

So informants and their families are killed all the time but I'm supposed to be all tear-up because some no name 20-something Afghani ventured to the wrong village?

Either you're soulless or a hypocrite who just came to the thread to vent and hate on teh evil west.

[HoreTore]

So informants and their families are killed all the time but I'm supposed to be all tear-up because some no name 20-something Afghani ventured to the wrong village?

When I said "20-something", I was referring to number, not age. Or in other words; you accept the death of 2000 but object to the death of 20.

Either you're soulless or a hypocrite who just came to the thread to vent and hate on teh evil west.

Hah!

doesn't this count as flame-baiting or something?

[Skullheadhq]

When I said "20-something", I was referring to number, not age. Or in other words; you accept the death of 2000 but object to the death of 20.

According to some 20 informants do outweight 2000 innocents including children and women, and if you disagree you're soulless.

doesn't this count as flame-baiting or something?

You're soulless and I'm a rich kid from another planet, we're such a good duo. We should form a team, you can be my sidekick.

[HoreTore]

Also; why is it a given that these people are going to die?

There are thousands and thousands of afghanis working for NATO, why are these people moved to the top of Talibans hit-list, above the governor who supports the troops, the truck driver bringing supplies, the police officer, et etc?

And why is it a given that the Taliban will actually succeed in killing these, as the governor, truck driver and police officer are all still alive?

[Myrddraal]

Civilians are killed or wounded by NATO forces all the time; that's okay, but I'm supposed to be all tear-up because 20-something informants are in danger of dying(unless they're already dead or they escape)? Puh-lease.

And might I note that people are also calling for the murder of the people working for WikiLeaks.... But that's okay too, right?

You're supposed to at least show some regret when anyone looses their life. It's not okay for civilians to be killed by NATO forces. It's not okay to murder WikiLeaks people. You know this, but you are being disgracefully callous with the lives of others.

[seireikhaan]

When I said "20-something", I was referring to number, not age. Or in other words; you accept the death of 2000 but object to the death of 20.

That's nice of you to sum up my views of afghanistan and its people for me

Hah!

doesn't this count as flame-baiting or something?

I'm not the one who's, at least, heavily implying that certain people's and their family's deaths would be less tragic than others.

[Andres]

Civilians are killed or wounded by NATO forces all the time; that's okay, but I'm supposed to be all tear-up because 20-something informants are in danger of dying(unless they're already dead or they escape)? Puh-lease.

Ok, so you don't give a damn about an additional 20 victims, not including their families. Fine.

And might I note that people are also calling for the murder of the people working for WikiLeaks.... But that's okay too, right?

Not me. I'm not calling for anyone's dead. But mister Wikileaks deserves a serious spanking.

People who work for one side in a conflict all know that it's very likely that they will have to flee at some point. Gawd, that's a basic fact of life, and something they must have considered when they chose to help NATO. As they still wanted to help NATO, it must mean that they would not object to relocating to another country.

Ehm, are you seriously thinking that the their enemies will now sit and wait for a couple of weeks to give these people and their families a fair chance to flee the country? For all we know, they're already dead as we speak.