Printable View
So it is just bias then , if the criteria fits both places but you only want to apply it to one .Quote:
you asked if my comment might equally apply to israel, and i responded;no, indicating that i was talking specifically about palestine.
Yes Thompson writes without any bias in the torygraph .Quote:
a typical example of which is described here:
In my experience I have witnessed the beeb obfuscate palestinian attacks in a way they almost never do for israeli attacks, if pointing this out is bias then yes i am biased.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
Regardless of whatever else Damian Thompson might do, the example he quotes is relevant and accurate to the experience i describe above, which is why i linked it.
Quote:
A typical little trick: if a suicide murderer blew up an innocent Israeli mother and child, the headline would read "Three killed in West Bank attack".
That's the problem. "Death to Israel" etc is used in the ME as a standard rallying call in some circles. But it's as tired a mantra as the "Axis of Evil" tbh. The paranoia may well have saved a lot more. It may not. Who knows. Right now it's causing as many problems as it is solving.Quote:
Originally Posted by hooahguy
The US has tried to wipe a few places off the map over the years - but those countries have managed to forget about it and move on. It's killed millions of Vietnamese, millions more Cambodians. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. And had a pivotal role in countless brutal proxy wars and suppressions in Africa and Central/South America. But none of those countries have become paranoid or devoted their existences to defending themselves against the next wave of US attacks.
:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:Quote:
Regardless of whatever else Damian Thompson might do, the example he quotes is relevant and accurate to the experience i describe above, which is why i linked it.
So for a measure of why he describes a headline as biased could you perhaps show the telegraph headline over the London bombings and tell me how that reads any different to the BBC headline about the West Bank bombing ?
The US is hardly top of the christmas card list though....Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho
"Regardless of whatever else Damian Thompson might do, the example he quotes is relevant and accurate to the experience i describe above, which is why i linked it."
It always a little bit pointless conversing with you Tribesman, but its great for developing patience.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
I described my experience of unbalanced beeb reporting on israel/palestine from years of watching the TV, and provide an example which i liken as typical to that which i have experienced.
Everything else in your statement is blather, you could choose to disagree with me and argue your point, but instead you use circumlocution to completely bypass the intent with a barge-load of negative waffle.
What is your purpose in making this statement, because it certainly does nothing to refute or invalidate mine.............?
israel was founded upon survivors of the Holocaust. if israel did let down their defenses, there wouldnt be an israel.Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho
also, the countries which the US supposedly tried to destroy arent now threatened seriously by others and there arent millions who are chanting for its destruction, at least, AFAIK.
i dont see thousands chanting for the destruction of 'nam or cambodia in the US. but i do see thousands chanting for the destruction of israel in multiple arab countries.
why do you find a problem with us jews being hell bent on survival? :inquisitive:
:israel:
Off the top of my head it would be the thousands of deaths of others, by intentional neglect and military action.Quote:
Originally Posted by hooahguy
~:smoking:
It does , unless you can show that the media didn't run with 56 killed in london attack since you seem to support Thompsons line that a headline of 3 killed in west bank attack is a sign of bias .Quote:
What is your purpose in making this statement, because it certainly does nothing to refute or invalidate mine.............?
Actually you are just showing your own bias , in the same way as the people that complained that the BBC were biased on the Iraq war ...complaints from both the people who supported the warand those who oppose it each claiming the BBC was biased against them , actually its just like the people who launch complaints that the BBC is too pro-Israeli .Quote:
I described my experience of unbalanced beeb reporting on israel/palestine from years of watching the TV, and provide an example which i liken as typical to that which i have experienced.
:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:Quote:
israel was founded upon survivors of the Holocaust.
Is that todays daily myth from hooah ?
that has nothing to do with the question of how israeli vs palestinian attacks are presented on beeb news.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
the comment was by way of explanation to another poster as to why i was pleased to see the der-spiegel article, and was not a provable or disprovable due to the fact it was based on my perception of tv news, so what is the point of this great circumlocution?
Kidding me? Where is the media when rockets hit Israel? Where is the media about the butchering in Darfur? Where was the media when muslim hordes were attacking serbs? The media is the leftist ministery of truth and they have made their choice they are just another stain on the wall.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
Cost to get British reporters to the Capital: None.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
Difficulty: None
Interest in the UK: massive
Cost to get reporters to Darfur: Considerable
Difficulty: Very - unsafe to boot
Interest in the UK - minimal
Yes, there are loads of conflicts. The safety of reporters in Israel is quite good (as long as you stay a long way from the borders as media crew vans are difficult to see with a modern tank's scope).
Getting the media in to the area is an issue you appear to be wilfully ignoring - as well as them not dying.
~:smoking:
Not talking about real journalists, they have zero chance to make it they are condemned to freelance, I am talking about whorenalists.
Oh, the unclean business of earning a wage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragony
What exactly is it that you do which allows you to sneer at everyone who has to compromise between what they'd like to do and what they have to do to earn a living?
~:smoking:
nope. no myth. do you really want to argue this? you know you are wrong. where do you think most of the survivors went? america pretty much closed its doors, and Europe is in shambles.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
where else to go? israel. duh.
im not talking about the actual founders. im talking about the people who made up most of the immigrants to israel.
ok tribesman, where do YOU think they went, if you think that comment was a myth?
:study:
Are you saying those are the same situations, with the same public perception of the context behind each event?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
CR
Once again you show how clueless you are , most of the survivors returned to their countries though a fairly large proportion ended up in america .Quote:
nope. no myth. do you really want to argue this? you know you are wrong. where do you think most of the survivors went? america pretty much closed its doors, and Europe is in shambles.
where else to go? israel. duh.
Perhaps your "research" is letting you down again , have you tried any of the places that study the shoah by any chance ?
Have you considered trying the Jewish documentation center for a start :dizzy2:
Looks like you're both right to an extent.
What I am saying is that if there are two similar headlines over two similar events how can one be biased and the other not .Quote:
Are you saying those are the same situations, with the same public perception of the context behind each event?
If both follow the headline with a story saying terrorist and two people killed and 4 terrorists and 52 people killed then all it demonstrates is not bias but the simple everyday practice of using short headlines .
I don't have any problem with us jews being hell bent on survival. I just have a problem if us jews decide that we need to kill 200 children as collective punishment for 10 Israelis dying.Quote:
Originally Posted by hooahguy
EVFM:Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars
Be careful sir, continued efforts to be reasonable such as the one displayed above might be cause for a warning.
~;)
whoooaaaaa.... i guess i just cant stand up to revisionist history, can i? :dizzy2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
dude, study the holocaust. the previous statement that you said proves that youve done no research of the aftermath. I learn my history from people like Dr. Lipstadt and such (just btw). of the people in israel in 1948, most were survivors.
btw most did not return to their homes in europe. most had no homes to go to. they were taken over by germans or poles.
more to come.
its not just 10 jews dieing. its many more. just from the start of the operation, 10 jews have died.Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho
do you know that the people in sderot only have 10 seconds to get to shelter? do you know that life has stopped there? no buisness, very little goes on in the streets. people are terrified to go out. no one should live in terror, which they have for since the rockets first started falling.
btw, what do you mean by "us jews" when i said that i was referring to myself and other jews.
now now, you know that israel did not collectively punish palestinians by killing 200 gazan kiddies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho
You won't find me justifying that. The rocket attacks need to stop. But killing hundreds of kids? Is that really contributing to the solution or merely adding to the injustice?Quote:
Originally Posted by hooahguy
Me too :yes:Quote:
btw, what do you mean by "us jews" when i said that i was referring to myself and other jews.
:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:Quote:
dude, study the holocaust. the previous statement that you said proves that youve done no research of the aftermath.
you are jewish?Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho
No!!!!!!!!! He...... Can't...... be!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by hooahguy
I mean, he's saying random killing isn't a good thing...
There must be some impure Gentile blood in there somewhere :inquisitive:
~:smoking:
im not saying that being jewish automatically makes you a supporter of israel. i was just surprised that he was. is being surprised a crime? :inquisitive:Quote:
Originally Posted by rory_20_uk
i do not believe that the IDF randomly kills kids. the 200 + dead children is very tragic, but i do not believe that the IDF goes on missions with the aim of killing children. that is not what my friends who have served in Gaza and the IDF have said, and there isnt anything that you can say that will make me think otherwise, unless the IDF says "our purpose is to kill children," which they have never said.
ok tribes. here ya go- her words exactly as he sent them to me:
those are her words and i swear by them.Quote:
From United States Holocaust Memorial Museum website
Quote:
With over 80,000 Jewish DPs in the United States, about 136,000 in Israel, and another 20,000 in other nations, including Canada and South Africa, the DP emigration crisis came to an end. Almost all of the DP camps were closed by 1952. The Jewish displaced persons began new lives in their new homelands around the world.
There are other estimates but what is clear is that the biggest number went to Israel. It’s hard to know precisely how many stayed in Europe since many were behind the Iron Curtain and we could never get a clear count. The estimate is that 250,000 survived as Displaced Persons [DPs]. There were certainly survivors who never went to the DP camps, e.g. in Poland, USSR, etc.
Deborah E. Lipstadt, Ph.D.
Dorot Professor of Modern Jewish and Holocaust Studies
Emory University