I agree insofar as anyone who flippantly says "I would've shot him if I was there." is full of it on several levels. It would've taken a
lot of guts to draw your weapon and make yourself a target in that situation. It would've taken a miracle for one armed victim to make a difference in this instance. However in different circumstances, one armed victim can defend people from
multiple assailants.
A question about the body armor- has anyone heard any details about what armor he was actually wearing? There's a lot of
talk about it being just a nylon tactical vest. It won't change what happened no matter what he was wearing- but I wish it was detailed somewhere.
Really, I don't think there's much for people on either side of the gun debate to use. Armed citizens most likely wouldn't have made much difference, nor would tighter gun regulations mattered much in the end....