Quote Originally Posted by TinCow View Post
So, I'm guilty because I've played several games with Andres and recognize a pattern in how he does the write-ups? Nice. Please explain how it is "highly likely" that Chimpyang's theory is accurate.

Let's see if I can summarize the votes against me:

Sasaki - Gut instinct
YLC - Gut instinct, being too helpful, and disagreement with my interpretation of the write-up
Chimpyang - I have a URL avatar that is in a suit of armor
Husar - pevers died and I was annoyed with them

That's an incredible case you guys have built. It looks more like you've all flocked like lemmings to the 'gut instinct' claims by Sasaki and 'khaan and only tried to look for something scummy on me afterwards to justify meatballing. If I'm the choice for today's inevitable bandwagon, so be it, but at least do me the courtesy of putting forth a decent argument.
If the argument is poor, why the vehemence? I for one, think it's the most sound case today, but that can change.

And, again, your focusing in on one aspect of why I said your guilty - I said your unnecessarily focusing on the write ups without creating anything productive at all. Your being helpful, while leading us nowhere. Your focusing on something that won't vote you back for poor reasoning. Your focusing on specific aspects that do not help find any of the killers, and when an avenue is brought up that might find a killer, you squash it. And for someone who has played in many of Andres games, and for someone who is usually very timely in gathering a case and being productive in finding the necessary evidence, your sorely lacking in this game. Shall I start bringing up Ephesus? Or should I bring in your posts from Midgard Saga II?

I am not following Khaan or Sasaki's "gut instinct" do not assign that to me TC - I have a case, I've stated it, and will continue to push it until your proven innocent or when it becomes clear that there is a more viable lynch.