When you click "Reply" and then "Go Advanced", you'll see a button in the lower part of the screen that says "Manage Attachments". You can probably do it from there ;)
When you click "Reply" and then "Go Advanced", you'll see a button in the lower part of the screen that says "Manage Attachments". You can probably do it from there ;)
This space intentionally left blank.
Originally Posted by SwissBarbar
Wait, I told not the truth ^^ I just realized, that I got 105 Provinces, meaning enough for the Augustan Reforms. Must have had the number of Provinces in mind, which I had before conquering Mikra Asia. Since I have more than 400 battles fought, the Augustan reforms now only depend on the right FM to come.
Yes, the Ptolemaioi did all except Baktria by themselves. Baktria was defeated by the Pahlava. The greatest strength the Ptolies had, was when they used to posses all they have now PLUS all of Egypt and Mikra Asia. For example:
This is 160 BC:
And this is 104 BC:
Now imagine the Ptolemaic Empire in between these Dates, f.e. 130 BC. It was an insane fight. They had fullstacks of elite troops with experience they gained in their fights against AS, Baktria, Pahlava and the Hay. I lost about 30'000 soldiers to conquer Egypt alone.
30´000 losses?! That's like what, 10 fullstacks?! Can't imagine what kind of manpower The Yellow Feever have in that case.
Fighting all those gold chevroned elite fullstacks must have been a pain in the duck, hopefully in EB II the Ptolemaio will be weakened, they always seem to blitz the east.
Last edited by Arthur, king of the Britons; 02-16-2010 at 01:10. Reason: I'm an idiot.
Agreed. Them and the AS. Having played the AS, I can say that if you weather the first 20-30 turns, the rest of the campaign is easy as pie. The one hard part towards the end for me was the invasion of mainland Greece, where I was sustaining heavy casualties. Otherwise it was really easy. Pahlava needs to be strengthened. The Ptolemaioi need...something. Maybe a less stable public order so that there might be more revolts - I remember reading about a pretty nasty one they had in Polybius. Although I'm not nearly enough of an expert to say whether or not that revolt was typical. Another thought, maybe they should get a lot of bad traits as time goes on to represent the inbreeding customs that they picked up from the Egyptians. -M
My Balloons:
I as far as I remember revolts was not too uncommon in the AS and the Ptolematic empire, the loyalty feature in MTW II will probably come in handy.
And about the inbreeding, it really sucks that you can't marry princesses to their brothers, would make for some interesting roleplaying don't you think?
Indeed. That's what was insane. I mean.. it's not the first time that I have fought a great ptolemaic empire, but indeed the first time that they defended them so well. I must say, that I never replay lost battles, retreat, if the losses get too high, and I see that the battle is lost (though this depends from the general's traits) and I never place one Unit upon another to get denser formations, etc. I had to train new soldiers permanently in Italy and Spain to compensate the losses. But it was pretty fun.
Balloon-Count: x 15
Many thanks to Hooahguy for this great sig.
Here's the savegame
http://www.file-upload.net/download-.../Roma.sav.html
Balloon-Count: x 15
Many thanks to Hooahguy for this great sig.
Originally Posted by Equilibrius
Completed Campaigns: Epeiros (EB1.0), Romani (EB1.1), Baktria (1.2) and Arche Seleukeia
1x From Olaf the Great for my quote!
3x1x<-- From Maion Maroneios for succesful campaigns!
5x2x<-- From Aemilius Paulus for winning a contest!
1x From Mulceber!
ow! Impressive empires Fluvius Camillus nice screenshots. My Seleucid Empire is almost at the world domination atm, will post pics later.
Death to all the overnice greeks and romani!!! Death to the so called "civilized"!
Stinking Rrrratttsss!!!
Nice empires, all.
The Caravel Mod: a (very much) improvedvanilla MTW/VI v2.1 early campaign
Please make sure you have the latest version (v3.3)
Since v3.3 the Caravel Mod includes customised campaigns for huge and default unit settings
Download v3.3
Info & Discussion Thread
Got lucky in that AS didn't bother me until 263BC and sent piddly little armies I could easily deal with. Used FD a bit to try and get Pahlava, Pontos and Baktria to actually do something, but only Pahlava actually has. That Ptolemaioi army besieging Karkathiokerta is thanks to the genius of the AI - "My god we now share a miniscule border, I guess we better go to war"
Cool Hay Empire.
IDK if Ptoly-Reforms help. If the Ptolies are too weak the AS will go crazy with a great empire. Somehow both must be stopped from eating each other and then having an insane Empire.
Balloon-Count: x 15
Many thanks to Hooahguy for this great sig.
Nice Hay Empire indeed, a difficult faction at best. Well done Sir.
I think the way to avoid either the Yellow Fever or the Grey Death is to have high discontent in their cities somehow. I just had a go at WRI in BI and there is nothing that curbs your ambitions as high discontent and ruined economy combined.
'For months Augustus let hair and beard grow and occasionally banged his head against the walls whilst shouting; "Quinctillius Varus, give me my legions back"' -Sueton, Augustus.
"Deliver us oh God, from the fury of the Norsemen", French prayer, 9th century.
Ask gi'r klask! ask-vikingekampgruppe.dk
Balloon count: 13
Well, it is quite historical that they eat up each other, they are sworn enemies and if Rome did not interfere in history, the decaying Ptollies would have been taken by the Seleukids. Imagine both lands combined under someone like Antiochos III Megas Or IV Epiphanes. Both empires had a good chance to become one of the dominant empires of the time, instead of the Romani. But Romani never expand east in my campaigns, so they don't interfere as in history, so apart from the annoyance of fighting fullstacks, there is nothing strange about it.
~Fluvius
Originally Posted by Equilibrius
Completed Campaigns: Epeiros (EB1.0), Romani (EB1.1), Baktria (1.2) and Arche Seleukeia
1x From Olaf the Great for my quote!
3x1x<-- From Maion Maroneios for succesful campaigns!
5x2x<-- From Aemilius Paulus for winning a contest!
1x From Mulceber!
Few tough battles but it was mostly done with the troops I started off with - now silver chevron Caucasian Archers and Eastern Slingers. My 2nd king died just after I had gotten Karkathiokerta through treaty - the AI being smart for once - which made for a great RP moment - he'd spent his life uniting the Caucasus and died in peace knowing his dream was complete.
Ok, I have a quck question:
-MSpoiler Alert, click show to read:
My Balloons:
"I should like to see any power of the world destroy this race, this small tribe of unimportant people, whose history is ended, whose wars have been fought and lost, whose structures have crumbled, whose literature is unread, whose prayers are no longer answered.... For when two of them meet anywhere in the world, see if they will not create a new Armenia!
William Saroyan, 1935.
High kings of the Mountains: A Hayasdan AAR
But, in EB 1.2 you need to have Kyrene in order to win as KH, so you shouldn't have won. Unless you are playing EB 1.0 or 1.1 and victory conditions were changed.
I'm playing 1.1, although I'm pretty sure I didn't change any victory conditions - at least, I can't think of any way by which I might have done so. -M
My Balloons:
I mean that EB team may have changed victory conditions in EB 1.2 and they are different from the ones in EB 1.1 . Victory condition maps were made for 0.80 or 1.0 (I remember seeing a post about it), so they are outdated. You should look at your FL victory conditions trait or press the "?" button in faction overview screen (but that may not work as you have already won).
Just checked my faction leader's scroll and here's what I found:
So apparently I did win legitimately. =D Although I must say, I'm surprised by how few settlements the KH must hold - I mean, sure, they're very disparate, and I suppose that's what makes for the challenge, but still, not very many. I mean, I didn't even really need to conquer Asia Minor. -M
My Balloons:
Makedonia 258 B.C
Got a bit of a situation
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Last edited by shootie; 02-25-2010 at 23:48.
Completed Campaigns:
RS: Pergamon, Rome.
EB: Roma
Vanilla: Seleucids, Brutii, Scipii, Jullii, Macedon, Greek Cities, Carthage
Failed:
RS: Bosperans, Epirus
EB: Saka, Epirus, Pontos.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Syntax:
["SPOIL"]INSERT YOUR TEXT HERE["/SPOIL"]
*remove quotation marks and you're set
EB Online Founder | Website
Former Projects:
- Vartan's EB Submod Compilation Pack
- Asia ton Barbaron (Armenian linguistics)
- EB:NOM (Armenian linguistics/history)
- Dominion of the Sword (Armenian linguistics/history, videographer)
Hmm... Well eventually you will have to attack the AS given that you will want to conquer Asia Minor but it wouldn't hurt if you waited a bit since they seem to be getting beat up by the Ptolemaioi. Same goes for Pontos, you probably will have to expand in the east battling against them although byzantion is buffer-sort-of settlement as it separates Asia from Europe and most likely you don't want to border the AS as they will defenitely attack you. IHMO you should capture Krete and get some archers, consolidate greece and try to build some mines in tylis. Also the adriatic cities (dalminion, segestica) might be the most profitable with +2 mines in the game along with Pella, so you might want to get your hands on them. Good job capturing Rhodos by the way. 9 times out of 10 there is a fullstack of elites guarding the city whenever I try to take it so most of the times it is a while before I try to.
Yeah seems a good idea. A thought I had was to capture Byzantion and gift it to my Dogs Epirus. And If Pontos take it back they would have a depleted army. Krete I havent really thought about capturing, mainly because I was busy with the Epriote war. I send a little 6-unit army to check out Rhodos as my spy in Asia Minor told me that the the bulk of the KH force had just emigrated to Asia Minor taking Halikarnassos. My spy told me there was only a unit in Rhodos, a FM. So it was easy enough to take it.
And thanks Vartan! :D
Completed Campaigns:
RS: Pergamon, Rome.
EB: Roma
Vanilla: Seleucids, Brutii, Scipii, Jullii, Macedon, Greek Cities, Carthage
Failed:
RS: Bosperans, Epirus
EB: Saka, Epirus, Pontos.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Looks good!
May I ask why you changed the colours?
~Fluvius
Originally Posted by Equilibrius
Completed Campaigns: Epeiros (EB1.0), Romani (EB1.1), Baktria (1.2) and Arche Seleukeia
1x From Olaf the Great for my quote!
3x1x<-- From Maion Maroneios for succesful campaigns!
5x2x<-- From Aemilius Paulus for winning a contest!
1x From Mulceber!
Well, Ive always like Makedonia as blue (In every mod I play) as I think it suits them more than Baktria. And Ive never like Epirus being green too, and I looked at a RTR VII preview and found the Epriote colour "neon" light blue like that and I thought it suited them aswell. So then after doing them both I decided to change alot of colours. You cant quite see in the screen but I changed KH to a sort of colour like the Greek-Cities in Vanilla, Carthage ive never thought white suited a African faction and looking online I found a emblem of Carthage in that colour. Also changed Baktria to a sort of Dark-Flesh colour like in RTR. I never really fell in love with Aremenia being Darker in EB so I made thme Neon too.
Last edited by shootie; 02-26-2010 at 00:01.
Completed Campaigns:
RS: Pergamon, Rome.
EB: Roma
Vanilla: Seleucids, Brutii, Scipii, Jullii, Macedon, Greek Cities, Carthage
Failed:
RS: Bosperans, Epirus
EB: Saka, Epirus, Pontos.
Funny enough that this had to happen on the next turn.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Completed Campaigns:
RS: Pergamon, Rome.
EB: Roma
Vanilla: Seleucids, Brutii, Scipii, Jullii, Macedon, Greek Cities, Carthage
Failed:
RS: Bosperans, Epirus
EB: Saka, Epirus, Pontos.
Bookmarks