Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Sapping

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Sapping

    I use to always use just sapping, but that was with mostly cavalry armies (with mercenaries to handle the saps). Infantry is too slow getting through the holes, and will get shot up by the towers.

    Plus, in my Thrace game, I found the computer was pretty stupid about choosing the sap points. Put them on opposite walls of a corner tower. So once the walls went down, the tower was impossible to capture, as you couldn't get there (and no "door", as it was a corner). I decided to reload that one, as there was no way I could get my army through without taking heavy losses. If I get stuck with that situation again, I'll use the siege tower first, and do the saps after.

    Bh

  2. #2

    Exclamation Re: Sapping

    Had a sap collapse on the sapping unit causing 80% casualties and loss of sap. Ticked off because I had used Praetorians - note to self: use cheap expendable infantry to sap .

  3. #3
    Just another genius Member aw89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The land of sleet
    Posts
    445

    Default Re: Sapping

    didn't know they could colapse... it makes sense though.


  4. #4
    Member Member Ziu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Kyoto
    Posts
    118

    Default Re: Sapping

    Yes, when you are defending you can direct you archers to fire on the sap entry point (using fire of course). As with the rams and towers it will hopefully take damage and collapse.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Senior Member econ21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,651

    Default Re: Sapping

    I don't like sapping - the towers can really cut up your infantry when they come through the hole (unless you can sap under a tower and destroy it - can you?). I lost half a unit of hastati first time I tried it. The units following will also get peppered. Plus you have to repair the wall, which is trivial but annoying.

    I much prefer siege towers. You lose virtually no men in approach and often can quickly take the walls, so you lose virtually no men from being on the walls. I use three - one goes for the gates, the other two clear out the towers either side and turn them against the defenders. You can then run your main army through the gates without being shot at by towers. You are also attacking from three directions - the gates and the two towers either side.

    However, I have not stormed very heavily defended large cities - I can see if there are lots of good troops on the wall, the towers may be less good. Usually my longer range archers can take down most of the troops on the walls before the towers unload.

  6. #6
    Rout Meister Member KyodaiSteeleye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Potton, near Sandy, the centre of the unknown universe
    Posts
    350

    Default Re: Sapping

    so captured towers start shooting at the defenders?
    KyodaiSpan, KyodaiSteeleye, PFJ_Span, Bohemund. Learn to recognise psychopaths

  7. #7
    Senior Member Senior Member econ21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,651

    Default Re: Sapping

    Quote Originally Posted by KyodaiSteeleye
    so captured towers start shooting at the defenders?
    Yup - seems that way to me. However, they don't do that much damage - the AI tends to move off, out of range. But that's good too - its give you a little breathing room to get inside the city. Unfortunately, as soon as you start to enter, the AI seems to rush back to confront you and combat is so chaotic, I can't tell what damage the towers are doing - but they keep firing.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO