BUT in MTW you had arbalesters, pavisiers and crossbows with longer range and higher attack, so I think archers are ok.
BUT in MTW you had arbalesters, pavisiers and crossbows with longer range and higher attack, so I think archers are ok.
Managing perceptions goes hand in hand with managing expectations - Masamune
Pie is merely the power of the state intruding into the private lives of the working class. - Beirut
I think another difference between MTW, STW and RTW which has been brought up before and is worth noting is that it seems like all the archers can fire at once in RTW, whereas before it was only the front 2 ranks. This makes comparisons of damage effects etc that much more tricky. That said though, I rarely have missile units run out of ammo before the battle ends even though they're all firing more arrows per volley - I guess because the combat is over that much faster in RTW?
Arbalesters had the potiential for high kills but took a long time as their reload was slow and they had only same range as basic archers in RTW (120 meters)
In STW/MTW you could have more than 2 ranks of archers shooting.
RTW melee is fast and of course units can run 50% faster than in MTW so its rare that RTW archers run out of ammo if enemy close in for melee quickly.
CBR
Oh OK - my facts don't stand up to scrutiny! I'm sure there is a limit to the numbers of rows of archers/crossbows that can fire in MTW simultaneously though - although apparently it's more than 2...
Also, in certain situations, like firing in oblique lines etc, in previous games only certain archers from the unit would fire, whereas now all the archers will fire, again increasing the overall effect of a volley.
But yeah, the general speed increase can neutralise the added potency of archers - unless your trying to chase down an Egyptian army with a bunch of Sacred Band infantry... pincushion-tastic!
I'd suggest trying the Total Combat mod ( http://www.twcenter.net/downloads/db/?mod=210 ) I've been playing with it in my latest Pontus campaign and it seems to work out pretty good. Archers/Slingers are only really effective versus unarmored/lightly armored targets. You'll only take out 1 or 2 per volley on heavily armored/shielded targets.
"Every good communist should know political power grows out of the barrel of a gun." - Mao tse-Tung
Indeed. The AI needs some concept of dodging arrows as a whole. I wonder whether it is possible to add a concept of "enemy's arrow range" and try to stay out of it unless totally necessary.
For example, when defending a siege, AI just runs around on the street to become mobile targets of enemy archers outside. One time I had 6 regular archers in the army, and they shot down everything, including generals, that joined the parade behind the gate.
If AI knows to hide behind a tall building and wait till enemy rush in the gate, that will be more interesting. :)
Guide: Guide of Bait Tactics
Campaign Stories: (in progress) Making a God of War (Uesugi)
(completed) Iga Ninjutsu is Good (Hattori), Yee-Yee-Oh! (Mori), Pagans' Requiem (Shimazu), Discharge the Honourable (Chosokabe)
Battle Stories: Legion of Faith, Wanderer of Faith
In Shogun archers were the best unit you could reallyl field, they were great.
In Medieval, The archers were firing blunts, I didn't like them.
In Rome, I'm really happy with standard Archers and Slingers.
For one, after playing Shogun for 2 years, I really like the archers in Rome.
I pledge allegiance to the underworld One nation under dog,There of which I stand alone,A face in the crowdUnsung, against the mold
Without a doubt
Singled out
The only way I know
Stepped out of the line,Like a sheep runs from the herd
Marching out of time,To my own beat now
The only way I know
One light, one mind,Flashing in the dark
Blinded by the silence of a thousand broken hearts
"For crying out loud" she screamed unto me
A free for all,Screw 'em all
You are your own sight
I want to be the minority,I don't need your authority
Down with the moral majority,I want to be the minority
Bookmarks