The Bug Fixes Thread!

[Whacker]

Seeing how he hasn't got his lazy rear in here to post this, I'll do it for him... Geez some people.

Kobal2fr's outstanding fixed VnV's: https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?t=75505

He's listed it as a mod, but I prefer to think of it as more along the lines of bugfixer for RTW/BI. There's some subjective work in it, for the most part it's just real bugs being squished and tweaked, but that's really no different than bugfixer either.


I should also mention the.seneshcal's Medifix mod, which does have a big more subjective work done to rebalance issues. Either works well depending on what you prefer: https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?t=75326 Also gets .

[Fisherking]

There is still a bug with missions from Noble counsel. When you assault a city or castle they have order taken without sieging it for one turn, you still don't complete the mission. Also noticed joining a crusade on the last passable turn didn't accomplish the mission. They are small but a little bothersome.

[Quillan]

Many, many of these are subjective judgements rather than true bugs. That noble council mission specifically tells you to send a diplomat to secure ownership of the particular province from the other faction, not an army. Janissary Heavy Infantry perform much better on the battlefield than their stats indicate, much as Varangian Guard perform much worse than they should according to their stats. Retinue Longbowmen aren't better archers than Yeomen, but they are armored. That's the difference.

The trait/ancillary triggers are fairly obvious mistakes. Some troop stats are wrong.

[SMZ]

I don't care how good JHI's perform. They still get beat by English Billmen, which are the same basic troop type, just better... which does not make a lick of sense

subjective? yes - but it's a glaring error nonetheless - either the billmen should suck more, or the JHI's should be better - take your pick

secondly, every other line of troops sees the higher level forms increase their attack power - ie: Heavy Billmen aren't just armored versions of Billmen, they also have a higher attack rating to reflect that they are the more advanced form of the unit - Heavy Pike Militia aren't just Scots Pike Militia given armor, their attack increases as well - etc, etc, etc across the board... it makes no sense to thus call Retinues simply Yeoman given armor

as the description says, Yeoman are freeholders expected to train in their downtime and be ready for war... Retinues are essentially mercenary bands who's business is war - their training is better... they should be better archers

[Schugger]

Maybe it is just me, but something seems odd about how the game is calculating turns (one turn equals two years, alternating seasons) and the age of characters (they age just by one year each turn).
Wilhelm "Methusalix" the Conquerer deceased in my campaign in 1130. Considering that he was 50 in 1080, he almost became of biblic age.
Known issue?

And merry Christmas, guys

[Foz]

Maybe it is just me, but something seems odd about how the game is calculating turns (one turn equals two years, alternating seasons) and the age of characters (they age just by one year each turn).
Wilhelm "Methusalix" the Conquerer deceased in my campaign in 1130. Considering that he was 50 in 1080, he almost became of biblic age.
Known issue?

And merry Christmas, guys

I agree, it feels slightly strange, but I think it's done to maintain game balance (especially in traits), since the passage of time actually IS a setting we can control. IIRC the default is the 2 years per turn that you described, but we can also set it for 1 year per turn and some other one I can't remember. Since buildings go up in a given number of turns, and the trait system is based primarily on per-turn calculations, characters always have to age at 1 year per turn, or else different timescales would mean your characters had a disproportionately short or long length of time to develop, which would make those time scales far easier or harder, correspondingly, from a character usability standpoint. For instance if your characters aged as fast as the years in 2-year-per-turn mode, they'd live about 30 turns, see far less buildings built under them, develop less traits and to a lesser degree of development, and have difficulty earning anything near the max number of command (or any other stat) stars. Similarly, Agents in 6-month-per-turn mode would live insanely long 120-turn-ish lives, and would be uber in no time. So I think it is that way to keep the characters developing at the rate CA intended, but still allow us to make time pass more slowly or quickly, which affects when inventions and events come about, as well as how long we have to accomplish the objective.

[Wizzie]

Maybe it is just me, but something seems odd about how the game is calculating turns (one turn equals two years, alternating seasons) and the age of characters (they age just by one year each turn).
Wilhelm "Methusalix" the Conquerer deceased in my campaign in 1130. Considering that he was 50 in 1080, he almost became of biblic age.
Known issue?

And merry Christmas, guys

This is not a bug. It's a feature, or perhaps better described as simply the way the game is supposed to work. Since there is such a massive time scale covered in this game, for it to progress at a reasonable rate while still activating all events like Gunpowder, the Americas, etc. in a reasonable timestamp, a turn rate of two years per turn was implemented. However, if characters aged at this rate they would die off in 1/4 of the time they did in Rome. Since character stats and progression mechanics etc. are presumably hardcoded in the game engine, it made more sense to maintain the Rome aging rate of 1 year for every 2 turns - in order for good generals to develop before dying of old age. This has resulted in an abstract aging model which CA left easily moddable.

[Bobalude]

Description of Bug and how to replicate it: Can't build watchtowers or forts / limited movement. Don't know how to replicate, just happens on some regions.
Probable Cause: Disaster event got stuck or something so the game thinks its still active many turns later.
Suggested Fix: Wait or cause another disaster in the region that clears up correctly.

Working Fix (workaround): Edit the disasters file to force a disaster event to occur, run the saved game for a turn or two so the event happens, save, and revert the disaster file back to the original.

The file is: data\world\maps\base\descr_disasters.txt

Make a copy of the file first, then edit the original and make a copy of the first entry, for earthquake, and delete the "climate" line. Replace that line with "Position" specifying the affected region. You need to lookup the position of the city with the affected region using "show_cursorstat" in the game console with the mouse cursor over the city.

Change min/max scale to 1 to reduce the effects of the disaster, and the year/frequency from 20 to either 1 or 2. I'm playing with 2 turns/year (0.50 time scale), so if you are using the default 2 years per turn, I would try 2 instead of the 1 that I used. These numbers appear to be in years, so with a 0.50 timescale, or 2 turns per year, it takes 2 game turns for it to occur.

Save the file (its read-only so you have to undo that property). Load your game, and run a turn or two. Hopefully an earthquake will properly hit and undo the watchtower/fort bug. Save post-earthquake and then go back and restore the original descr_disasters file.

--------
Lastly, I noticed that this oddly didn't work in the odd game turns using 0.50 timescale. That is if the saved game was during a particular season or 1/2 of a year, the disaster event will never trigger for some reason. Simply go back to a saved game 1 turn earlier seems to fix it. Guessing it only counts properly either every even or odd turn number... or if the game starts at a half year, it never triggers (i.e. year 1110.5).