King of the Romans OOC thread VIII

**econ21** · 06-28-2007, 09:23

Originally Posted by Stuperman

all I know about was Gaza and Corsica (which we have 'clearance to')

Why do we have clearance to take Gaza? CA10.2 implies we need an edict to take a new province - we have one for the two Milanese islands and Moscow; I don't think we have one for anywhere else.

**Stig** · 06-28-2007, 09:55

He doesn't seem to care and ruins the game with it.

We agreed OOC on less expansion, why break something like that? Unless you wish to ruin the game for others.

And he still needs to answer me on that Crusade. I've asked the question multiple times. Not answering is simply rude and shows no respect (hence why I don't give anything to you).

**econ21** · 06-28-2007, 10:06

Stig, please cool down. Ignoramus has told you that Anselhelm is not leading the crusade because of the election. If he has made a secret deal in character, he does not have to reveal the details to you out of character.

**Stig** · 06-28-2007, 10:19

And where did he do that, all he said was is:

Oh, and Stig, there's an IC reason why Ulrich couldn't send Ansehelm on the expedition.

He still needs to give the reason

**Ituralde** · 06-28-2007, 10:40

It really is important to relax a little here. We have every right to be angry with Ulrich Hümmel, but we clearly should not be angry with Ignoramus.

I don't mind a Chancellor once in a while that is not afraid of making enemies. None the less the rate of it is astounding.

Edit: Oh and yes, it seems like I'm the new Prince. Wanted to let this evolve later on, but I'm not afraid to use my Princehood should the Dukes decide to not act.

**Stig** · 06-28-2007, 10:49

Gibson still needs to fight a battle, so I say to him: take your time before you get your character killed. (and in 48 hours refuse to fight the battle (they might not even attack you afterall))

Than the dukes have a change to act, or the Prinz.

And I have nothing against Igno, I think it's just rude that he doesn't answer my question. He doesn't need to give an entire explanation, but he can say more than:

Oh, and Stig, there's an IC reason why Ulrich couldn't send Ansehelm on the expedition.

The only thing I have against him OOC is that he very well knows that he's killing the Franconian House. He send Peter to death and mostlikely Ansehelm will die in a few turns.

**Ignoramus** · 06-28-2007, 11:43

How many times do I need to tell you that I am "not" trying to kill off anyone. I didn't order Peter to attack the Russians, they attacked him. I tried to retreat, but I found there were no movement points remaining. I was genuinely suprised when that Russian army appeared. I don't have "grudges" against Houses, I try and play the game by three measures:

1). How I would play normally in a campaign.
2). How my character would run the empire.
3.) According to the Diet(can be overriden by 2, if the character has disloyal traits).

I am sorry if you are annoyed by the fact that Ansehelm isn't going on the expedition. I'm not happy at destroying someone's fun, but "nameless people" required that of me before they would vote for me. Why, I don't know, but in order to win the election I had to agree. It would be unfair for me to reveal who the people were, and so that's all I can say. I hope that answers your question.

Please don't attack me OOC; attack Ulrich Hummel IC all you like, but I don't have a grudge or malice against anyone. If some of my actions are taking some of the fun out of the game, I apologise. But you never know, I might get impeached and someone else might be Chancellor(hopefully not).

**Stig** · 06-28-2007, 11:48

Yup that answer my question

And I think those people are pretty sad indeed

But the least you could do is allow me to attack the Poles Ansehelm is stuck to and retreat to Thorn

BTW I do know who asked not to send me on that crusade. It's someone with his special secret order, and he knows I'm right

And you have the choice: ignoring an edict or ignoring some voters, one is worse than the other