Thanks.

So what exactly would be seen as "good contributions" to, for instance, receive "best contributor"?

And am I correct to assume that -- showing a simple example -- if a member has made one good contribution this would count as a +(1) and that if he or she also made a bad contribution this would count, logically, as a -(1), therefore the negative one would negate the positive one and state a contribution of 0?

So suppose someone made a thousand good contributions (+1000) but he or she did not behave well at certain times, made some bad contributions, and this together has a value of -- let' say for example -- -740 the member would have had a so-called "score" of +260? And the higher the "score" the more probability one would have to receive such an award?