Foreign Policy (war, alliances, tariffs, etc)
Domestic Policy (taxes, constitutional adherance, poverty, etc)
Gah!
Some other choice
I believe CA was referring to the anonymous, un-linked un-attributed list of 46 hysterical attacks. By all means, post some more of that sort of stuff. Does your credibility wonders.
Martial Law is declared here, and a 48-hour curfew imposed, so staff can sort the bloodied from the bloodiers. Thread will re-open this time Friday, 13 June, hopefully with a more civil tone. My apologies to readers.![]()
Last edited by KukriKhan; 06-12-2008 at 14:34.
Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.
Thread is re-opened, a couple of hours later than promised. My apologies (longer than usual workday).![]()
Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.
Well, as you're probably aware, Fox News went for the trifecta. First there was calling for Obama's assassination, then there was the "terrorist fist-jab," and now it's calling Michelle Obama his "baby mama," a phrase normally reserved for unmarried women who you've knocked up.
Best comment on the subject so far:
Calling Michelle Obama a “baby mama” isn’t just Fox News having a happy casual larf; it’s using urban slang to a) remind you the Obamas are black, b) belittle a woman of considerable personal accomplishment, and c) frame Barack Obama’s relationship to his wife and children in a way that insults him, minimizes his love for and commitment to his family, and reinforces stereotypes about black men. Someone at Fox News just ought to call Barack Obama “boy” at some point so we can have all the cards right out there on the table.
As I stated in another thread it seems Snopes has gone through and proved all this false.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/50lies.asp
So, did you copy and paste this without knowing they were lies, if so it shows that you are uninformed, or did you know they were lies, and are now helping to perpetuate those lies?
Which one is it?
As far as your YouTube video, it is quit easy to tell that Obama is describing what thing were like for him growing up. That and the fact that the statements are incomplete. Perhaps you shoud try and post something with some type of substance.
Last edited by m52nickerson; 06-15-2008 at 02:03.
Well, that settles it- I won't be voting for FoxNews this November. What? It's not running? Oh, nevermind then.Originally Posted by Lemur
![]()
Last edited by Xiahou; 06-14-2008 at 04:50.
"Don't believe everything you read online."
-Abraham Lincoln
Xiahou, the responses from the blogosphere have been hilarious; you'd have to be made of the anti-funny to not enjoy them. Maybe the best one-liner: "Did no one at that Fox Chyron department know how to spell 'Negress?' "
But the Scalzi post I linked to has some doozies worthy of Devastatin' Dave himself:
Back in the day – you know, when presidential candidates were respectably white – news organizations called potential First Ladies “wives.” But now that black folks are running, we can get all funky fresh with the lingo, yo. So it’s basically fine for Fox News to use “Baby Mama” for Michelle Obama, slang that implies a married 44-year-old Princeton-educated lawyer is, to use an Urban Dictionary definition of the term, “some chick you knocked up on accident during a fling who you can’t stand but you have to tolerate cuz she got your baby now.” Because the Obamas are black! And the blacks, they be all relaxed about that ****, yo. Word up.
Breaking news - Obama's half brother is part of the vast right-wing conspiracy to smear Obama as a Muslim!
Now, it seems to me Obama does have a history of being raised in a Muslim background, Indonesia specifically. Why the Clintonesque need to completely deny that and so turn a non-event politically into something where it can be said he's lying about his past?
And I really hope no one is stupid enough to go after Obama's wife with what they have now. It should be enough to simply show Obama's positions on the issues, namely international, like saying Jerusalem will remain undivided, then backing down much quicker than he did in his unilateral talks with Iran thing.
And my support for McCain is growing after hearing of his economic/tax plan.
CR
Ja Mata, Tosa.
The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder
I read in the Boston Globe that the Barack Obama campaign has set up a website to repudiate the web based rumors about him and his family:
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/ar..._fight_rumors/
The article makes the point that this is an interesting tactic considering the conventional wisdom is that by trying to fight rumors you only serve to spread them.
Still the whole "Barack is a secret Muslim" meme has some traction, so maybe it is best to fight it.
A link to the site itself (responds to some accusations made up thread):
http://my.barackobama.com/page/conte...thesmearshome/
And a trip to snopes is always a good idea. I still get emails from one or two of my friends about one urban legend or another, ie the Post Office is going to tax e-mails.
Of course, people will believe what they want to believe, even if it isn't true.
Chretien Saisset, Chevalier in the King of the Franks PBM
That is the sad fact. Instead of people focus on lies and half truths. You know there is a large segment of the population that would say that Obama is a black Muslim but could not tell you the smallest thing about his platform. It's the same for McCain, all they know it that he is a former veteran who spent many years as a P.O.W., but could not tell you were he stood on any issues.
We can't even have a discussion here with out people bringing in all kinds of crap.
I think the candidates themselves are largely to blame for that. Commit themselves to a specific policy this early? They wouldn't dare, and with the media too lazy to challenge them on that matter it's going to stay that way for some time yet.
It's the same everywhere. I may not like Gordon Brown, for instance, but the opposition is getting a very easy time of it without having to present what their alternatives will be.
"The facts of history cannot be purely objective, since they become facts of history only in virtue of the significance attached to them by the historian." E.H. Carr
The media does share some of the blame, but it is the voters that listen to the media don't do any research for them selfs and vote on who is wearing an American flag pin on there suit.
I do think as time goes on this will improve. My son's (he's two) generation will grow up so internet proficient that they will be far more informed then we are. I think people will more and more come to realize what is important and what is not.
I think we are there as evidenced by the success of Obama. We'll put aside the fact he beat the clinton machine at thier own game a second (not to minimalize it), but getting caught in the crap about his religion, racial make up, expirence is a waste of time.
Whats important here is people have realized whats important, and thats giving the U.S. political system a major enema and flushing out the conservatives. We realize whats important, we may stay the course (OMG am I quoting Bush?) here in the states but this ones a slam dunk.
Conservatives have set us back so far that the person who represents the greatest change will win. So it happens to be a black man, who had a muslim father and a white grandmother (I thought it would be a female, but I digress). The conservatives created an entire new cabinet level of government, forced Tommy Franks into a ridiculous battle plan for Iraq, created huge deficits, pissed on personal freedoms and have let the infrastructure of the country go to.
So whats important is, is someone put a new roll of toilet paper in the bathroom and flush
And thats whats going to happen. Sure you will be able to spend pages and pages and minutes of your time bickering back and forth with the various elements here at the org as to who voted for what bill when, or "does he raise his pinky when he drinks, thats the white coming out" but its really a very simple situation.
What is important, is the conservative government of the last 8 years has had a mamoth failre accross the board. They had it all in 2000 and what did they do with it? a well funded successful aids relief program in africa.
What people have come to realize, is that they made a mistake to trust Bush. Yep big mistake was made in 04, but hey 06 the people started to flush away the conservatives so hang in there. Your forecast for the future enlightenment is optomistic and its refreshing, but you've missed the mark its happening now.
Its happening now because the conservatives failed accross the board on a mamoth scale, their majority was unprecedented and they blew, so take heart friend we realized it.
Last edited by Odin; 06-15-2008 at 04:58. Reason: naughty words, we might have kids here after all...
There are few things more annoying than some idiot who has never done anything trying to say definitively how something should be done.
Sua Sponte
Well said...
I concur. Excellent post Odin
As for polling (Seeing as I am absolute poll junkie), Obama has been getting a lot of party unity bounces across the country and the two sites that I watch the most closely (links in their title) for Electoral Vote distributions are showing the following:
Five Thirty Eight:
Obama 308.5 EVs (64.7% chance of victory - Lines up with the trading markets)
McCain 229.5 EVs (35.3%)
Popular vote - Obama 51.4, McCain 48.6
Note that this site was apparently quite accurate during the Primary season, and has recently updated its methodology to help predict states that haven't received much in the way of recent polling data. The methodology is very complex and takes into account long-term trends as well as recent polling averages. Overall I would trust this as quite accurate.
Electoral Vote Predictor:
Obama 304
McCain 221
Tied 13
This site has a much more simple methodology - an average of all the polls in the last week. Probably not as accurate as the other site, but seeing as the two coincide quite well I would be willing to say that this site isn't too bad. It also has an excellent Senate map.
Last edited by CountArach; 06-15-2008 at 05:09.
Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
I have two things I'd like to say.
First, I'll acknowledge that Obama has a lead on McCain.
Second, I'll point out that it's nowhere near as big as Kerry's or Gore's over Bush was at this point. One thing I've learned... it'll always be a photo finish.
As for the disrespecting of Michele Obama, shameful. I think she can be quite chafing, but implying she's an out of wedlock mother? Pathetic.
"A man who doesn't spend time with his family can never be a real man."
Don Vito Corleone: The Godfather, Part 1.
"Then wait for them and swear to God in heaven that if they spew that bull to you or your family again you will cave there heads in with a sledgehammer"
Strike for the South
Hmm, that's not what the professional poll-smokers are saying ...
While polls can't accurately gauge an election five months out -- after all, so much can still happen -- it's worth putting Obama's lead into this perspective: Bush never trailed Kerry in the 2004 NBC/WSJ polls that measured registered voters' preference for Bush, Kerry, and Nader. And Bush's lead was never bigger than four points.
Bush won that presidential election by three percentage points, 51%-48%.
Here were the NBC/WSJ trial heats from March 2004 (when Kerry pretty much locked up the nomination) to late October 2004:
March (Mar.6-8): Bush 46%, Kerry 43%, Nader 5%
May (May 1-3): Bush 46%, Kerry 42%, Nader 5%
June (June 25-28): Bush 45%, Kerry 44%, Nader 4%
July (July 19-21): Bush 47%, Kerry 45%, Nader 2%
August (Aug.23-25): Bush 47%, Kerry 45%, Nader 3%
September (Sept.17-19): Bush 48%, Kerry 45%, Nader 2%
Mid October (Oct.16-18): Bush 48%, Kerry 46%, Nader 2%
Late October (Oct.29-31): Bush 48%, Kerry 47%, Nader 1%
"A man who doesn't spend time with his family can never be a real man."
Don Vito Corleone: The Godfather, Part 1.
"Then wait for them and swear to God in heaven that if they spew that bull to you or your family again you will cave there heads in with a sledgehammer"
Strike for the South
2004 Polling Averages
Analysis
From April onward, John Kerry never held a lead of more than about 2 points in the Real Clear Politics national average, and George W. Bush never held a lead of more than 6 or 7 points. Those numbers pretty well framed the actual result of Bush +2.4.
Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
Fascinating. And here all this time, I thought Bush had more comebacks than Rocky. Was it that close with Gore all the time too?
Anyway, thanks for the info Lemur & CA.
Last edited by Don Corleone; 06-15-2008 at 06:01.
"A man who doesn't spend time with his family can never be a real man."
Don Vito Corleone: The Godfather, Part 1.
"Then wait for them and swear to God in heaven that if they spew that bull to you or your family again you will cave there heads in with a sledgehammer"
Strike for the South
Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford
My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.
I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.
Last edited by m52nickerson; 06-15-2008 at 06:18.
Bookmarks