Ignoring Kantakouzinos, he addresses Savvas.
But the issue is not the money. The issue is that the Caesar built priortized construction before raising armies required by law. The law is cut and dry just like it was when Hypatios violated an Edict.
The Caesar broke the law and none of you can whitewash this very basic fact. And to even attempt it is quite puzzling. So, according to you Savvas, laws can be broken by some people and not others?
If we let the Caesar get away with this, then our very Constitution is worth little more than toilet paper. We might as well have anarchy.
Those who defend the Caesar are stuck defending a lawbreaker pure and simple.
Bookmarks